Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLGPX vs RGACX
CLGPX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts CLGPX vs RGACX
Columbia Large Cap Growth Opp R
Price$17.86
Change-$0.03 (-0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.31B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$82.10
Change-$0.06 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets329.22B
CLGPX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLGPX vs. RGACX commentary
Aug 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLGPX is a Buy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 329B vs. CLGPX (1.31B). RGACX pays higher dividends than CLGPX: RGACX (0.07) vs CLGPX (0.00). CLGPX was incepted earlier than RGACX: CLGPX (9 years) vs RGACX (23 years). CLGPX (1.36) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). CLGPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). CLGPX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGACX: CLGPX (0) vs RGACX (250). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.08 vs. CLGPX (12.87). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 41.95 vs. CLGPX (-16.25).
| CLGPX | RGACX | CLGPX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.30 | 0.94 | 138% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.94 | 145% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.297 | 14.044 | 38% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.31B | 329B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.87 | 14.08 | 91% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.98 | 41.19 | 102% |
| Returns for 5 years | -16.25 | 41.95 | -39% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 83.68 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement