Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLGPX vs RGACX
CLGPX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts CLGPX vs RGACX
CLGPX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLGPX vs. RGACX commentary
Jun 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLGPX is a Hold and RGACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. CLGPX (1.33B). CLGPX (0.00) and RGACX (0.00) have matching dividends . CLGPX was incepted earlier than RGACX: CLGPX (10 years) vs RGACX (24 years). CLGPX (1.36) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.93). CLGPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 53.00 vs. RGACX (32.00). CLGPX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGACX: CLGPX (0) vs RGACX (250). CLGPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.48 vs. RGACX (11.41). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 16.59 vs. CLGPX (-15.10).
| CLGPX | RGACX | CLGPX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.30 | 0.93 | 140% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.93 | 146% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.869 | 8.547 | 92% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.33B | 361B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.48 | 11.41 | 188% |
| Returns for 3 years | 58.94 | 46.24 | 127% |
| Returns for 5 years | -15.10 | 16.59 | -91% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 112.59 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement