Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLGPX vs RGACX
CLGPX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts CLGPX vs RGACX
CLGPX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLGPX vs. RGACX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLGPX is a Buy and RGACX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 342B vs. CLGPX (1.31B). CLGPX (0.00) and RGACX (0.00) have matching dividends . CLGPX was incepted earlier than RGACX: CLGPX (10 years) vs RGACX (24 years). CLGPX (1.37) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.93). CLGPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 53.00 vs. RGACX (32.00). CLGPX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGACX: CLGPX (0) vs RGACX (250). CLGPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.50 vs. RGACX (4.90). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 14.75 vs. CLGPX (-20.68).
| CLGPX | RGACX | CLGPX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 0.93 | 135% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.37 | 0.93 | 147% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.590 | 9.193 | 50% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.31B | 342B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.50 | 4.90 | 194% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.42 | 44.95 | 114% |
| Returns for 5 years | -20.68 | 14.75 | -140% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 96.44 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement