Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLGRX vs GAFFX
CLGRX vs GAFFX Comparison
Open Charts CLGRX vs GAFFX
CLGRX vs GAFFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLGRX vs. GAFFX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLGRX is a Buy and GAFFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GAFFX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. CLGRX (1.07B). GAFFX pays higher dividends than CLGRX: GAFFX (0.51) vs CLGRX (0.47). CLGRX was incepted earlier than GAFFX: CLGRX (5 years) vs GAFFX (10 years). CLGRX (0.31) is less costly to investors than GAFFX (0.29). GAFFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. CLGRX (30.00). GAFFX has a lower initial minimum investment than CLGRX: GAFFX (1000000) vs CLGRX (5000000). CLGRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.60 vs. GAFFX (0.48).
| CLGRX | GAFFX | CLGRX / GAFFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.21 | 0.29 | 72% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.29 | 107% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.832 | 9.307 | 95% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 1000000 | 500% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.07B | 353B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.47 | 0.51 | 92% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.60 | 0.48 | 2,001% |
| Returns for 3 years | 66.09 | 44.59 | 148% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 14.95 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | 703.18 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers