Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLGRX vs RGABX
CLGRX vs RGABX Comparison
Open Charts CLGRX vs RGABX
CLGRX vs RGABX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLGRX vs. RGABX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLGRX is a Buy and RGABX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGABX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. CLGRX (1.07B). CLGRX pays higher dividends than RGABX: CLGRX (0.47) vs RGABX (0.00). CLGRX was incepted earlier than RGABX: CLGRX (5 years) vs RGABX (24 years). RGABX (1.38) is less costly to investors than CLGRX (0.31). RGABX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. CLGRX (30.00). RGABX has a lower initial minimum investment than CLGRX: RGABX (250) vs CLGRX (5000000). CLGRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.60 vs. RGABX (-1.94).
| CLGRX | RGABX | CLGRX / RGABX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.21 | 1.38 | 15% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 1.38 | 22% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.832 | 8.489 | 104% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 250 | 2,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.07B | 353B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.47 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.60 | -1.94 | -495% |
| Returns for 3 years | 66.09 | 35.88 | 184% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 5.33 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | 703.18 | 86.62 | 812% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement