Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLGRX vs RGAGX
CLGRX vs RGAGX Comparison
Open Charts CLGRX vs RGAGX
CLGRX vs RGAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLGRX vs. RGAGX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLGRX is a Buy and RGAGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. CLGRX (1.07B). RGAGX pays higher dividends than CLGRX: RGAGX (0.51) vs CLGRX (0.47). CLGRX was incepted earlier than RGAGX: CLGRX (5 years) vs RGAGX (17 years). CLGRX (0.31) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.29). RGAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. CLGRX (30.00). RGAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than CLGRX: RGAGX (250) vs CLGRX (5000000). CLGRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.60 vs. RGAGX (0.49).
| CLGRX | RGAGX | CLGRX / RGAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.21 | 0.29 | 72% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.29 | 107% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.832 | 9.321 | 95% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 250 | 2,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.07B | 353B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.47 | 0.51 | 93% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.60 | 0.49 | 1,961% |
| Returns for 3 years | 66.09 | 44.65 | 148% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 15.00 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | 703.18 | 110.30 | 637% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement