Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLGRX vs RGAHX
CLGRX vs RGAHX Comparison
Open Charts CLGRX vs RGAHX
CLGRX vs RGAHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLGRX vs. RGAHX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLGRX is a Buy and RGAHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. CLGRX (1.07B). CLGRX pays higher dividends than RGAHX: CLGRX (0.47) vs RGAHX (0.40). CLGRX was incepted earlier than RGAHX: CLGRX (5 years) vs RGAHX (11 years). RGAHX (0.44) is less costly to investors than CLGRX (0.31). RGAHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. CLGRX (30.00). RGAHX has a lower initial minimum investment than CLGRX: RGAHX (250) vs CLGRX (5000000). CLGRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.60 vs. RGAHX (0.18).
| CLGRX | RGAHX | CLGRX / RGAHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.21 | 0.44 | 48% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.44 | 70% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.832 | 9.200 | 96% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 250 | 2,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.07B | 353B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.47 | 0.40 | 119% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.60 | 0.18 | 5,344% |
| Returns for 3 years | 66.09 | 43.47 | 152% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 13.78 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | 703.18 | 106.68 | 659% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement