Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLGRX vs RGEBX
CLGRX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts CLGRX vs RGEBX
CLGRX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLGRX vs. RGEBX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLGRX is a Buy and RGEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. CLGRX (1.07B). CLGRX pays higher dividends than RGEBX: CLGRX (0.47) vs RGEBX (0.00). CLGRX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: CLGRX (5 years) vs RGEBX (12 years). RGEBX (1.08) is less costly to investors than CLGRX (0.31). RGEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. CLGRX (30.00). RGEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than CLGRX: RGEBX (250) vs CLGRX (5000000). CLGRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.60 vs. RGEBX (-0.77).
| CLGRX | RGEBX | CLGRX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.21 | 1.08 | 19% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 1.08 | 29% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.832 | 8.727 | 101% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 250 | 2,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.07B | 353B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.47 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.60 | -0.77 | -1,240% |
| Returns for 3 years | 66.09 | 39.77 | 166% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 9.71 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | 703.18 | 97.58 | 721% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement