Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLGRX vs RGEBX
CLGRX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts CLGRX vs RGEBX
CLGRX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLGRX vs. RGEBX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLGRX is a Hold and RGEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. CLGRX (1.08B). CLGRX pays higher dividends than RGEBX: CLGRX (0.47) vs RGEBX (0.00). CLGRX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: CLGRX (4 years) vs RGEBX (12 years). RGEBX (1.08) is less costly to investors than CLGRX (0.31). RGEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. CLGRX (30.00). RGEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than CLGRX: RGEBX (250) vs CLGRX (5000000). CLGRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.55 vs. RGEBX (7.66).
| CLGRX | RGEBX | CLGRX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.21 | 1.08 | 19% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 1.08 | 29% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.097 | 6.118 | 165% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 250 | 2,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.08B | 361B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.47 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 23.55 | 7.66 | 307% |
| Returns for 3 years | 72.50 | 42.13 | 172% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 12.07 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | 756.62 | 104.15 | 727% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement