CLH
Price
$211.10
Change
-$0.90 (-0.42%)
Updated
Apr 25, 02:19 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
10.63B
5 days until earnings call
LICYF
Price
$0.32
Change
+$0.01 (+3.23%)
Updated
Apr 24 closing price
Capitalization
184.42M
Ad is loading...

CLH vs LICYF

Header iconCLH vs LICYF Comparison
Open Charts CLH vs LICYFBanner chart's image
Clean Harbors
Price$211.10
Change-$0.90 (-0.42%)
Volume$100
Capitalization10.63B
Li-Cycle Holdings
Price$0.32
Change+$0.01 (+3.23%)
Volume$66.23K
Capitalization184.42M
CLH vs LICYF Comparison Chart
Loading...
CLH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LICYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CLH vs. LICYF commentary
Apr 25, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLH is a StrongBuy and LICYF is a Buy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 25, 2025
Stock price -- (CLH: $212.00 vs. LICYF: $0.32)
Brand notoriety: CLH and LICYF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Environmental Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CLH: 46% vs. LICYF: 14%
Market capitalization -- CLH: $10.63B vs. LICYF: $184.42M
CLH [@Environmental Services] is valued at $10.63B. LICYF’s [@Environmental Services] market capitalization is $184.42M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Environmental Services] industry ranges from $85.6B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Environmental Services] industry is $6.51B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CLH’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileLICYF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CLH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • LICYF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CLH is a better buy in the long-term than LICYF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CLH’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LICYF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CLH’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • LICYF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CLH is a better buy in the short-term than LICYF.

Price Growth

CLH (@Environmental Services) experienced а +2.45% price change this week, while LICYF (@Environmental Services) price change was +17.43% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Environmental Services industry was +2.71%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.21%, and the average quarterly price growth was -8.41%.

Reported Earning Dates

CLH is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2025.

LICYF is expected to report earnings on Mar 31, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Environmental Services (+2.71% weekly)

Environmental Services includes companies that collect and dispose of hazardous and non-hazardous waste. Their services include removal of toxic waste from soil, removing medical waste etc. Some companies also operate incinerators, sewerage systems, waste treatment plants, and landfills. Demand for waste management is likely to rise with increasing urbanization/industrialization. Waste Management, Inc., Republic Services, Inc., Waste Connections, Inc. and Tetra Tech, Inc. are some of the major companies in this business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLH($10.6B) has a higher market cap than LICYF($184M). CLH YTD gains are higher at: -7.882 vs. LICYF (-82.123). CLH has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 990M vs. LICYF (-121.4M). CLH has more cash in the bank: 551M vs. LICYF (70.6M). LICYF has less debt than CLH: LICYF (351M) vs CLH (2.49B). CLH has higher revenues than LICYF: CLH (5.41B) vs LICYF (18.3M).
CLHLICYFCLH / LICYF
Capitalization10.6B184M5,761%
EBITDA990M-121.4M-815%
Gain YTD-7.882-82.12310%
P/E Ratio28.35N/A-
Revenue5.41B18.3M29,557%
Total Cash551M70.6M780%
Total Debt2.49B351M709%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CLH: Fundamental Ratings
CLH
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
15
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
76
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
16
SMR RATING
1..100
52
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
57
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
43
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CLHLICYF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
86%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
71%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CLH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LICYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IBLC27.100.77
+2.92%
iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF
VOE155.322.21
+1.44%
Vanguard Mid-Cap Value ETF
IBTM22.800.11
+0.48%
iShares iBonds Dec 2032 Term Trs ETF
PDX21.420.08
+0.37%
PIMCO Dynamic Income Strategy Fund
HAPS23.33N/A
N/A
Harbor Human Capital Factor US Sm CapETF

CLH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CLH has been loosely correlated with NVRI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CLH jumps, then NVRI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CLH
1D Price
Change %
CLH100%
+1.16%
NVRI - CLH
53%
Loosely correlated
+8.81%
WCN - CLH
50%
Loosely correlated
+0.53%
CWST - CLH
46%
Loosely correlated
+1.90%
GFL - CLH
34%
Loosely correlated
+1.54%
QRHC - CLH
30%
Poorly correlated
+2.94%
More

LICYF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LICYF has been loosely correlated with NVRI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LICYF jumps, then NVRI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LICYF
1D Price
Change %
LICYF100%
+4.58%
NVRI - LICYF
43%
Loosely correlated
+8.81%
AQMS - LICYF
29%
Poorly correlated
+2.76%
CLH - LICYF
27%
Poorly correlated
+1.16%
WM - LICYF
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.51%
CWST - LICYF
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.90%
More