CLH
Price
$317.21
Change
+$0.11 (+0.03%)
Updated
Sep 8, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
16.74B
56 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
GFL
Price
$42.87
Change
-$0.86 (-1.97%)
Updated
Sep 8, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
18.69B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CLH vs GFL

CLH vs GFL Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CLH vs. GFL commentary
Sep 09, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLH is a StrongBuy and GFL is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 09, 2026
Stock price -- (CLH: $317.13 vs. GFL: $42.87)
Brand notoriety: CLH and GFL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Environmental Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CLH: 90% vs. GFL: 278%
Market capitalization -- CLH: $16.74B vs. GFL: $18.69B
CLH [@Environmental Services] is valued at $16.74B. GFL’s [@Environmental Services] market capitalization is $18.69B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Environmental Services] industry ranges from $87.05B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Environmental Services] industry is $11.54B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CLH’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileGFL’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CLH’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • GFL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CLH is a better buy in the long-term than GFL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CLH’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GFL’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CLH’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • GFL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CLH is a better buy in the short-term than GFL.

Price Growth

CLH (@Environmental Services) experienced а +0.60% price change this week, while GFL (@Environmental Services) price change was +3.30% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Environmental Services industry was +2.86%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.72%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.03%.

Reported Earning Dates

CLH is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Environmental Services (+2.86% weekly)

Environmental Services includes companies that collect and dispose of hazardous and non-hazardous waste. Their services include removal of toxic waste from soil, removing medical waste etc. Some companies also operate incinerators, sewerage systems, waste treatment plants, and landfills. Demand for waste management is likely to rise with increasing urbanization/industrialization. Waste Management, Inc., Republic Services, Inc., Waste Connections, Inc. and Tetra Tech, Inc. are some of the major companies in this business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFL($18.7B) has a higher market cap than CLH($16.7B). GFL has higher P/E ratio than CLH: GFL (108.15) vs CLH (38.44). CLH YTD gains are higher at: 35.248 vs. GFL (-0.069). GFL has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.65B vs. CLH (1.22B). CLH has more cash in the bank: 517M vs. GFL (192M). CLH has less debt than GFL: CLH (3.03B) vs GFL (10.1B). GFL has higher revenues than CLH: GFL (6.97B) vs CLH (6.24B).
CLHGFLCLH / GFL
Capitalization16.7B18.7B89%
EBITDA1.22B1.65B74%
Gain YTD35.248-0.069-51,386%
P/E Ratio38.44108.1536%
Revenue6.24B6.97B90%
Total Cash517M192M269%
Total Debt3.03B10.1B30%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CLH vs GFL: Fundamental Ratings
CLH
GFL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
80
Overvalued
84
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1269
SMR RATING
1..100
5592
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4548
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
32100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5055

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CLH's Valuation (80) in the Environmental Services industry is in the same range as GFL (84) in the null industry. This means that CLH’s stock grew similarly to GFL’s over the last 12 months.

CLH's Profit vs Risk Rating (12) in the Environmental Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GFL (69) in the null industry. This means that CLH’s stock grew somewhat faster than GFL’s over the last 12 months.

CLH's SMR Rating (55) in the Environmental Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GFL (92) in the null industry. This means that CLH’s stock grew somewhat faster than GFL’s over the last 12 months.

CLH's Price Growth Rating (45) in the Environmental Services industry is in the same range as GFL (48) in the null industry. This means that CLH’s stock grew similarly to GFL’s over the last 12 months.

CLH's P/E Growth Rating (32) in the Environmental Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for GFL (100) in the null industry. This means that CLH’s stock grew significantly faster than GFL’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CLHGFL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
70%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
50%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
66%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
58%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
67%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
66%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 26 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
66%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
61%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
73%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CLH
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
GFL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MTSI274.805.85
+2.18%
MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings
EVO1.82-0.04
-2.15%
Evotec SE
KEQU36.01-0.98
-2.65%
Kewaunee Scientific Corp
MTR2.51-0.09
-3.46%
Mesa Royalty Trust
HGV40.55-1.50
-3.57%
Hilton Grand Vacations