CLH
Price
$312.51
Change
+$2.28 (+0.73%)
Updated
Oct 1 closing price
Capitalization
16.54B
33 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
GFL
Price
$40.43
Change
-$1.40 (-3.35%)
Updated
Oct 1 closing price
Capitalization
18.05B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CLH vs GFL

CLH vs GFL Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CLH vs. GFL commentary
Oct 02, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLH is a StrongBuy and GFL is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CLH vs GFL: Fundamental Ratings
CLH
GFL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3165
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
82
Overvalued
85
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1379
SMR RATING
1..100
5592
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4453
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
27100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CLH's Valuation (82) in the Environmental Services industry is in the same range as GFL (85) in the null industry. This means that CLH’s stock grew similarly to GFL’s over the last 12 months.

CLH's Profit vs Risk Rating (13) in the Environmental Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for GFL (79) in the null industry. This means that CLH’s stock grew significantly faster than GFL’s over the last 12 months.

CLH's SMR Rating (55) in the Environmental Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GFL (92) in the null industry. This means that CLH’s stock grew somewhat faster than GFL’s over the last 12 months.

CLH's Price Growth Rating (44) in the Environmental Services industry is in the same range as GFL (53) in the null industry. This means that CLH’s stock grew similarly to GFL’s over the last 12 months.

CLH's P/E Growth Rating (27) in the Environmental Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for GFL (100) in the null industry. This means that CLH’s stock grew significantly faster than GFL’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CLHGFL
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
51%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 28 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 02, 2026
Stock price -- (CLH: $312.51 vs. GFL: $40.43)
Brand notoriety: CLH and GFL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Environmental Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CLH: 74% vs. GFL: 187%
Market capitalization -- CLH: $16.54B vs. GFL: $18.05B
CLH [@Environmental Services] is valued at $16.54B. GFL’s [@Environmental Services] market capitalization is $18.05B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Environmental Services] industry ranges from $4.98K to $82.52B. The average market capitalization across the [@Environmental Services] industry is $10.93B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CLH’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green while GFL’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CLH’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • GFL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CLH is a better buy in the long-term than GFL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CLH’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GFL’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CLH’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • GFL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GFL is a better buy in the short-term than CLH.

Price Growth

CLH (@Environmental Services) experienced а -1.13% price change this week, while GFL (@Environmental Services) price change was -3.25% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Environmental Services industry was -1.76%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -9.81%, and the average quarterly price growth was -3.75%.

Reported Earning Dates

CLH is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Environmental Services (-1.76% weekly)

Environmental Services includes companies that collect and dispose of hazardous and non-hazardous waste. Their services include removal of toxic waste from soil, removing medical waste etc. Some companies also operate incinerators, sewerage systems, waste treatment plants, and landfills. Demand for waste management is likely to rise with increasing urbanization/industrialization. Waste Management, Inc., Republic Services, Inc., Waste Connections, Inc. and Tetra Tech, Inc. are some of the major companies in this business.

View a ticker or compare two or three
CLH
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
GFL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SPRO1.260.05
+4.13%
Spero Therapeutics
CNA45.881.00
+2.23%
CNA Financial Corp
RAMP37.700.18
+0.48%
LiveRamp Holdings
TRUG2.94-0.03
-1.01%
Trugolf Holdings Inc
KDK1.67-0.25
-13.02%
Kodiak AI Inc

CLH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CLH has been loosely correlated with WCN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CLH jumps, then WCN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CLH
1D Price
Change %
CLH100%
+0.73%
WCN - CLH
43%
Loosely correlated
-2.12%
RSG - CLH
37%
Loosely correlated
-1.38%
GFL - CLH
32%
Poorly correlated
-3.35%
WM - CLH
32%
Poorly correlated
-0.99%
ONT - CLH
21%
Poorly correlated
-4.86%
More

GFL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GFL has been loosely correlated with WCN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GFL jumps, then WCN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GFL
1D Price
Change %
GFL100%
-3.35%
WCN - GFL
51%
Loosely correlated
-2.12%
RSG - GFL
44%
Loosely correlated
-1.38%
WM - GFL
42%
Loosely correlated
-0.99%
CWST - GFL
39%
Loosely correlated
-2.84%
CLH - GFL
32%
Poorly correlated
+0.73%
More