Investors and traders seeking exposure to the environmental services sector often evaluate Clean Harbors, Inc. (CLH) and Waste Connections, Inc. (WCN) due to their established roles in waste management and sustainability solutions. This comparison examines their business profiles, recent market behavior, and relative positioning to assist those analyzing sector peers for portfolio allocation or tactical decisions. The analysis draws on verifiable developments to highlight contrasts in scale, operations, and performance drivers without forecasting outcomes.
Clean Harbors, Inc. (CLH) provides environmental, industrial, and hazardous waste services, including remediation, recycling, and technical solutions across North America. In recent market activity, the stock has reflected steady demand for its specialized offerings amid economic and regulatory influences. Performance in recent weeks has been shaped by consistent operational execution and sector-wide stability in industrial activity, supporting sentiment without notable volatility spikes. Broader references to earnings trends and service volumes indicate resilience, with attention on margin management in a competitive landscape.
Waste Connections, Inc. (WCN) delivers integrated waste collection, transfer, disposal, and recycling services primarily in North America, serving residential, commercial, and industrial customers. Recent market activity shows the stock maintaining stability, influenced by predictable revenue streams from essential services and operational efficiencies. In recent weeks, performance has aligned with steady volume trends and cost controls, contributing to neutral-to-positive sentiment. Emphasis remains on scale advantages and integration of acquisitions, supporting consistent positioning relative to peers.
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates a selection of high-performing AI trading bots from hundreds available across thousands of tickers. Only those demonstrating strong suitability for prevailing market conditions earn placement in this section. Available bots span diverse trading styles, strategies, timeframes, performance metrics, and ticker sets, with statistics often including win rates in the 60-80% range and varying risk profiles depending on the model. This resource allows users to explore data-driven approaches tailored to specific instruments like environmental services stocks. Explore the options to identify bots aligned with individual preferences.
In business models, Clean Harbors, Inc. (CLH) differentiates through specialized industrial and remediation services, while Waste Connections, Inc. (WCN) emphasizes broad-scale collection and disposal networks. Growth drivers contrast with CLH tied to project-based and regulatory-driven demand versus WCN’s recurring revenue from volume-based operations. Recent momentum shows both navigating sector stability, though WCN’s larger footprint may offer more consistent cash flow visibility. Risk factors include shared exposure to commodity prices and regulations, with CLH potentially facing higher variability from industrial cycles. Market sentiment reflects balanced interest, favoring neither decisively based on observable stability and positioning within the environmental services space.
Based on observable factors such as trend consistency and relative positioning, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a slight probabilistic edge to Waste Connections, Inc. (WCN) due to its scale and recurring revenue characteristics, though Clean Harbors, Inc. (CLH) demonstrates comparable stability in specialized segments. This assessment remains probabilistic and subject to evolving data.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CLH’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileWCN’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CLH’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WCN’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
CLH (@Environmental Services) experienced а -1.32% price change this week, while WCN (@Environmental Services) price change was -3.64% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Environmental Services industry was -6.89%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.71%, and the average quarterly price growth was -11.23%.
CLH is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2026.
WCN is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2026.
Environmental Services includes companies that collect and dispose of hazardous and non-hazardous waste. Their services include removal of toxic waste from soil, removing medical waste etc. Some companies also operate incinerators, sewerage systems, waste treatment plants, and landfills. Demand for waste management is likely to rise with increasing urbanization/industrialization. Waste Management, Inc., Republic Services, Inc., Waste Connections, Inc. and Tetra Tech, Inc. are some of the major companies in this business.
| CLH | WCN | CLH / WCN | |
| Capitalization | 16.1B | 42.8B | 38% |
| EBITDA | 1.16B | 2.99B | 39% |
| Gain YTD | 30.702 | -3.786 | -811% |
| P/E Ratio | 41.16 | 40.97 | 100% |
| Revenue | 6.06B | 9.61B | 63% |
| Total Cash | 669M | 112M | 597% |
| Total Debt | 3.04B | 9.43B | 32% |
CLH | WCN | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 41 | 72 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 80 Overvalued | 43 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 14 | 46 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 58 | 63 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 45 | 51 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 25 | 91 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 90 | 55 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
WCN's Valuation (43) in the Environmental Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CLH (80). This means that WCN’s stock grew somewhat faster than CLH’s over the last 12 months.
CLH's Profit vs Risk Rating (14) in the Environmental Services industry is in the same range as WCN (46). This means that CLH’s stock grew similarly to WCN’s over the last 12 months.
CLH's SMR Rating (58) in the Environmental Services industry is in the same range as WCN (63). This means that CLH’s stock grew similarly to WCN’s over the last 12 months.
CLH's Price Growth Rating (45) in the Environmental Services industry is in the same range as WCN (51). This means that CLH’s stock grew similarly to WCN’s over the last 12 months.
CLH's P/E Growth Rating (25) in the Environmental Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for WCN (91). This means that CLH’s stock grew significantly faster than WCN’s over the last 12 months.
| CLH | WCN | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 49% | 2 days ago 44% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 51% | 2 days ago 47% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 41% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 38% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 53% | 2 days ago 45% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 40% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 9 days ago 46% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 48% | 3 days ago 46% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 57% | 2 days ago 49% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 31% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CLH has been loosely correlated with RSG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CLH jumps, then RSG could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WCN has been closely correlated with RSG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if WCN jumps, then RSG could also see price increases.