Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLIAX vs HBLAX
CLIAX vs HBLAX Comparison
Open Charts CLIAX vs HBLAX
CLIAX vs HBLAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLIAX vs. HBLAX commentary
Aug 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLIAX is a Hold and HBLAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLAX has more cash in the bank: 11.1B vs. CLIAX (319M). CLIAX pays higher dividends than HBLAX: CLIAX (3.40) vs HBLAX (3.15). CLIAX was incepted earlier than HBLAX: CLIAX (21 years) vs HBLAX (20 years). CLIAX (1.57) is less costly to investors than HBLAX (0.89). HBLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 90.00 vs. CLIAX (5.00). CLIAX has a lower initial minimum investment than HBLAX: CLIAX (1000) vs HBLAX (2000). HBLAX IRA initial investment is lower compared to CLIAX: HBLAX (2000) vs CLIAX (250). CLIAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.83 vs. HBLAX (4.92). CLIAX return over 5 years is better than : 14.96 vs. HBLAX (6.14).
| CLIAX | HBLAX | CLIAX / HBLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.57 | 0.89 | 176% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.57 | 0.89 | 176% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.371 | 5.964 | 90% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2000 | 50% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Net Assets | 319M | 11.1B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.40 | 3.15 | 108% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.83 | 4.92 | 200% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.46 | 23.09 | 128% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.96 | 6.14 | 244% |
| Returns for 10 years | 37.49 | 39.11 | 96% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement