CLILF
Price
$2.10
Change
+$0.13 (+6.60%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
13.16B
OMH
Price
$1.48
Change
+$0.12 (+8.82%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
21.59M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CLILF vs OMH

Header iconCLILF vs OMH Comparison
Open Charts CLILF vs OMHBanner chart's image
Capitaland Investment
Price$2.10
Change+$0.13 (+6.60%)
Volume$2.6K
Capitalization13.16B
Ohmyhome
Price$1.48
Change+$0.12 (+8.82%)
Volume$187.2K
Capitalization21.59M
CLILF vs OMH Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CLILF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OMH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CLILF vs. OMH commentary
Jul 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLILF is a Hold and OMH is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 05, 2025
Stock price -- (CLILF: $2.10 vs. OMH: $1.48)
Brand notoriety: CLILF and OMH are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Development industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CLILF: 10% vs. OMH: 4%
Market capitalization -- CLILF: $13.16B vs. OMH: $21.59M
CLILF [@Real Estate Development] is valued at $13.16B. OMH’s [@Real Estate Development] market capitalization is $21.59M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Development] industry ranges from $165.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Development] industry is $5.49B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CLILF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileOMH’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CLILF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • OMH’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CLILF is a better buy in the long-term than OMH.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CLILF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OMH’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CLILF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • OMH’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, OMH is a better buy in the short-term than CLILF.

Price Growth

CLILF (@Real Estate Development) experienced а +6.35% price change this week, while OMH (@Real Estate Development) price change was -3.90% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Development industry was +2.33%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.93%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.17%.

Reported Earning Dates

OMH is expected to report earnings on May 28, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Development (+2.33% weekly)

Activities range from the renovation and re-lease of existing buildings to the purchase of raw land and the sale of developed land or parcels to others. Demand for land development business is driven by GDP growth, employment rates, interest rates, and access to/cost of capital. For individual companies in this industry, proper cost estimation and successful bidding play critical roles in their profitability. Large companies could potentially have greater access to capital, while smaller companies can specialize in a specific geographic area or market niche. CBRE Group, VICI Properties Inc and Brookfield Property Partners L.P. are some of the large companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLILF($13.2B) has a higher market cap than OMH($21.6M). CLILF YTD gains are higher at: 8.376 vs. OMH (-63.009).
CLILFOMHCLILF / OMH
Capitalization13.2B21.6M61,111%
EBITDA1.96BN/A-
Gain YTD8.376-63.009-13%
P/E Ratio22.52N/A-
Revenue2.88BN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CLILFOMH
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
47%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
40%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
80%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
29%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CLILF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OMH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PCQ8.690.04
+0.46%
Pimco California Municipal Income Fund
PFN7.460.03
+0.40%
PIMCO Income Strategy Fund II
IBHK25.860.04
+0.14%
iShares iBonds 2031 Ter Hi Yld AndIncETF
QULL48.32N/A
N/A
ETRACS 2x Lvrgd MSCI US Qlty Fctr TR ETN
IAGG51.09-0.06
-0.12%
iShares Core International Aggt Bd ETF

CLILF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CLILF and SWPFF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CLILF and SWPFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CLILF
1D Price
Change %
CLILF100%
N/A
SWPFF - CLILF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SHMSF - CLILF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
OMH - CLILF
-2%
Poorly correlated
+8.82%
OZ - CLILF
-5%
Poorly correlated
-0.83%
VGPBF - CLILF
-6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

OMH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that OMH and GYRO have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that OMH and GYRO's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OMH
1D Price
Change %
OMH100%
+8.82%
GYRO - OMH
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BPYPP - OMH
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SGD - OMH
10%
Poorly correlated
-3.96%
MRNO - OMH
8%
Poorly correlated
+6.89%
AIRE - OMH
6%
Poorly correlated
-11.41%
More