Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLIX vs FFLS
CLIX vs FFLS Comparison
Open Charts CLIX vs FFLS
ProShares Long Online/Short Stores ETF
Price$60.73
Change+$0.04 (+0.07%)
Volume$1.13K
Net Assets7.58M
Future Fund Long/Short ETF
Price$24.73
Change+$0.04 (+0.16%)
Volume$2.75K
Net Assets40.37M
CLIX vs FFLS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLIX vs. FFLS commentary
Dec 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLIX is a Buy and FFLS is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFLS has more net assets: 40.4M vs. CLIX (7.58M). CLIX has a higher annual dividend yield than FFLS: CLIX (33.310) vs FFLS (7.417). CLIX was incepted earlier than FFLS: CLIX (8 years) vs FFLS (2 years). CLIX (0.65) has a lower expense ratio than FFLS (1.24). FFLS has a higher turnover CLIX (57.00) vs CLIX (57.00).
| CLIX | FFLS | CLIX / FFLS | |
| Gain YTD | 33.310 | 7.417 | 449% |
| Net Assets | 7.58M | 40.4M | 19% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.24 | 52% |
| Turnover | 57.00 | 313.00 | 18% |
| Yield | 0.38 | 0.16 | 235% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 2 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CLIX | FFLS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 75% | 3 days ago 51% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 89% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 88% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 82% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 57% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 82% | 9 days ago 81% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 20 days ago 83% | 6 days ago 53% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | N/A |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
CLIX and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CLIX and JMIA have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CLIX and JMIA's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CLIX | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CLIX | 100% | +0.07% | ||
| JMIA - CLIX | 20% Poorly correlated | -2.12% | ||
| EBAY - CLIX | 19% Poorly correlated | +0.22% | ||
| YSG - CLIX | 13% Poorly correlated | -0.17% | ||
| BARK - CLIX | 12% Poorly correlated | -2.08% | ||
| GRPN - CLIX | 12% Poorly correlated | +3.76% | ||
More | ||||
FFLS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FFLS has been loosely correlated with NVDA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FFLS jumps, then NVDA could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FFLS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FFLS | 100% | +0.14% | ||
| NVDA - FFLS | 59% Loosely correlated | +0.86% | ||
| META - FFLS | 55% Loosely correlated | +0.97% | ||
| GTLB - FFLS | 55% Loosely correlated | +5.39% | ||
| CRM - FFLS | 53% Loosely correlated | +0.81% | ||
| PANW - FFLS | 53% Loosely correlated | +1.15% | ||
More | ||||