CLLS
Price
$3.85
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
May 11, 04:55 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
379.18M
Earnings call today
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
PMVP
Price
$1.40
Change
-$0.01 (-0.71%)
Updated
May 11, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
75.19M
Earnings call today
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CLLS vs PMVP

Header iconCLLS vs PMVP Comparison
Open Charts CLLS vs PMVPBanner chart's image
CLLS vs PMVP Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Cellectis S.A. (CLLS) vs. PMV Pharmaceuticals (PMVP) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • Both CLLS and PMVP operate in the biotechnology sector, focusing on innovative therapies, but CLLS emphasizes gene-editing for allogeneic CAR-T cells while PMVP targets p53 mutations in oncology.
  • CLLS shows stronger recent momentum with a 196% one-year return and positive clinical data from its Cema-Cel trial, contrasting PMVP's 45% one-year gain amid cash preservation.
  • CLLS trades at $4.27 with a $440M market cap and $206M cash, while PMVP is at $1.35 with a $74M market cap, highlighting differing scales and valuations.
  • Recent developments include CLLS's pivotal trial interim data and PMVP's NEJM publication on rezatapopt, boosting sentiment for both.
  • Analyst targets suggest upside: $8 for CLLS (87% potential) versus median $5.50 for PMVP (307% potential from current levels).

Introduction

This stock comparison examines CLLS and PMVP, two clinical-stage biotechs navigating the dynamic healthcare landscape. Both companies target unmet needs in oncology through advanced therapies—gene-edited CAR-T cells for CLLS and p53-targeted small molecules for PMVP. Traders seeking momentum in biotech catalysts and investors eyeing relative performance in small-cap health stocks will find value here. Amid recent market volatility, their contrasting trajectories in clinical progress, cash positions, and price action offer insights into sector positioning and potential trade-offs in risk-reward profiles.

CLLS Overview and Recent Performance

Cellectis S.A. (CLLS) is a clinical-stage biopharmaceutical firm specializing in gene-editing technologies for allogeneic CAR-T cell therapies (chimeric antigen receptor T-cells, engineered immune cells targeting cancer). Its pipeline includes candidates like BALLI-01 for acute lymphoblastic leukemia and ALPHA3 for large B-cell lymphoma. In recent market activity, CLLS shares have surged, posting a 196% one-year return and 10.67% YTD gain as of April 2026, trading around $4.27 within a 52-week range of $1.33-$5.48. Market cap stands at $440M with $206M in cash supporting operations into 2027.

Sentiment has strengthened following Q4 2025 earnings, which reported $10.58M revenue despite an EPS miss, and pivotal interim data from the Cema-Cel trial underscoring its allogeneic CAR-T platform's potential. Analyst reiterations, like Citizens JMP's Market Outperform at $8, reflect optimism around manufacturing capabilities and milestone payments, driving recent price behavior amid broader biotech interest.

PMVP Overview and Recent Performance

PMV Pharmaceuticals (PMVP), a precision oncology company, develops small-molecule therapies reactivating mutant p53 proteins in solid tumors. Its lead candidate, rezatapopt, targets a common mutation across cancers. Shares trade near $1.35, with a $74M market cap, in a 52-week range of $0.81-$1.88. Recent performance includes a 45% one-year gain and 10.80% YTD, though monthly dips reflect sector pressures.

Key influences include full-year 2025 results with an EPS beat in Q4 (-$0.34 vs. -$0.40 expected) and a New England Journal of Medicine publication on rezatapopt's first-in-human data showing selective p53 reactivation. These developments have supported relative stability, with analysts forecasting a median $5.50 target. Cash burn management bolsters its position, though smaller scale amplifies volatility compared to peers.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates 25 top-performing AI trading bots from over 351 total bots, selected by advanced algorithms for their suitability in current market conditions like volatility in biotech and semiconductors. These bots employ diverse strategies—trend following, swing trading, long/short pairs—across timeframes from 5 minutes to 60 minutes, trading thousands of tickers in stocks, ETFs, and crypto. Performance stats shine: annualized returns up to 136.62%, win rates from 53% to 87%, profit factors reaching 10.87, and equity growth examples like $48,782 on select agents. Outperforming the S&P 500 (e.g., +13.76% monthly vs. SPY's +2.59%), they offer risk-managed signals for copy trading. Explore these bots to enhance your strategy across varying styles and sectors.

Head-to-Head Comparison

CLLS and PMVP share biotech exposure but diverge in business models: CLLS's gene-editing enables off-the-shelf CAR-T scalability, contrasting PMVP's small-molecule focus on p53 for tumor-agnostic applications. Growth drivers include CLLS's pivotal trial momentum and partnerships versus PMVP's clinical validation in NEJM.

Recent momentum favors CLLS with superior returns and higher revenue ($79.6M ttm), while PMVP trades at a deeper discount to analyst targets. Risk factors: CLLS faces debt (114% debt/equity) and EPS losses; PMVP contends with cash burn in a micro-cap frame. Market sentiment leans positive for both amid oncology advances, but CLLS's larger cap offers relative stability.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI currently favors CLLS due to its trend consistency from clinical catalysts, stronger relative performance (196% vs. 45% one-year), and cash runway supporting near-term milestones. While PMVP shows promise in p53 data and higher upside potential, CLLS's momentum and platform validation position it probabilistically ahead in the current biotech environment.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full Disclaimers and Limitations.

VS
CLLS vs. PMVP commentary
May 12, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLLS is a Hold and PMVP is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 12, 2026
Stock price -- (CLLS: $3.85 vs. PMVP: $1.41)
Brand notoriety: CLLS and PMVP are both not notable
Both companies represent the Biotechnology industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CLLS: 71% vs. PMVP: 67%
Market capitalization -- CLLS: $379.18M vs. PMVP: $74.39M
CLLS [@Biotechnology] is valued at $379.18M. PMVP’s [@Biotechnology] market capitalization is $74.39M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Biotechnology] industry ranges from $110.45B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Biotechnology] industry is $2.22B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CLLS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePMVP’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CLLS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • PMVP’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CLLS is a better buy in the long-term than PMVP.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CLLS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PMVP’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CLLS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 7 bearish.
  • PMVP’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PMVP is a better buy in the short-term than CLLS.

Price Growth

CLLS (@Biotechnology) experienced а +4.05% price change this week, while PMVP (@Biotechnology) price change was +1.44% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Biotechnology industry was +0.17%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.03%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.71%.

Reported Earning Dates

CLLS is expected to report earnings on May 11, 2026.

PMVP is expected to report earnings on May 11, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Biotechnology (+0.17% weekly)

Biotechnology involves genetic or protein engineering to produce medicines/therapies for treating and preventing ailments. The industry also provides crucial ingredients for diagnostics. This multi-billion-dollar industry is heavily focused on research and development, as companies attempt to continually come up with cutting-edge solutions for health. New discoveries for the treatment of diseases provide opportunities for growth for a company in this industry. Discoveries, however, must pass the regulatory approval from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) before they can make it to markets. Amgen Inc., Gilead Sciences, Inc. and Celgene Corporation are examples of companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLLS($379M) has a higher market cap than PMVP($75.2M). PMVP YTD gains are higher at: 12.800 vs. CLLS (-20.455). CLLS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -6.07M vs. PMVP (-91.99M). CLLS has more cash in the bank: 190M vs. PMVP (129M). PMVP has less debt than CLLS: PMVP (931K) vs CLLS (92.8M). CLLS has higher revenues than PMVP: CLLS (75.3M) vs PMVP (0).
CLLSPMVPCLLS / PMVP
Capitalization379M75.2M504%
EBITDA-6.07M-91.99M7%
Gain YTD-20.45512.800-160%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue75.3M0-
Total Cash190M129M147%
Total Debt92.8M931K9,968%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CLLS: Fundamental Ratings
CLLS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
36
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
96
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
40
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CLLSPMVP
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
85%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
80%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
89%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 20 days ago
77%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
86%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CLLS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PMVP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VLEEY6.740.05
+0.74%
Valeo SE
EDDRF3.86N/A
N/A
EDreams Odigeo SA
IDTA0.17N/A
N/A
Identa Corp.
CLPBY6.30-0.12
-1.87%
Coloplast AS
KROEF0.19-0.02
-11.52%
KR1 PLC

PMVP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PMVP has been loosely correlated with CLLS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PMVP jumps, then CLLS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PMVP
1D Price
Change %
PMVP100%
-0.70%
CLLS - PMVP
39%
Loosely correlated
-0.26%
MTVA - PMVP
35%
Loosely correlated
-18.05%
CMVLF - PMVP
34%
Loosely correlated
N/A
ZIVO - PMVP
32%
Poorly correlated
-6.25%
AXON - PMVP
31%
Poorly correlated
-5.47%
More