CLLXF
Price
$0.72
Change
+$0.01 (+1.41%)
Updated
Nov 7 closing price
SOUHY
Price
$12.99
Change
+$0.67 (+5.44%)
Updated
Nov 7 closing price
97 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

CLLXF vs SOUHY

Header iconCLLXF vs SOUHY Comparison
Open Charts CLLXF vs SOUHYBanner chart's image
Callinex Mines
Price$0.72
Change+$0.01 (+1.41%)
Volume$4.07K
CapitalizationN/A
South32
Price$12.99
Change+$0.67 (+5.44%)
Volume$70.3K
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
CLLXF vs SOUHY Comparison Chart
Loading...
SOUHY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
VS
CLLXF vs. SOUHY commentary
Nov 08, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLLXF is a Hold and SOUHY is a StrongBuy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 08, 2024
Stock price -- (CLLXF: $0.72 vs. SOUHY: $12.99)
Brand notoriety: CLLXF and SOUHY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CLLXF: 54% vs. SOUHY: 92%
Market capitalization -- CLLXF: $35.08M vs. SOUHY: $11.81B
CLLXF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $35.08M. SOUHY’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $11.81B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.76B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CLLXF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSOUHY’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CLLXF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SOUHY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, SOUHY is a better buy in the long-term than CLLXF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SOUHY’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • SOUHY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

CLLXF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -2.35% price change this week, while SOUHY (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +8.98% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +0.75%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.43%, and the average quarterly price growth was -3.96%.

Reported Earning Dates

SOUHY is expected to report earnings on Feb 13, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+0.75% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SOUHY($11.8B) has a higher market cap than CLLXF($35.1M). CLLXF has higher P/E ratio than SOUHY: CLLXF (1111.11) vs SOUHY (5.16). SOUHY YTD gains are higher at: 17.172 vs. CLLXF (-46.148). SOUHY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 3.94B vs. CLLXF (337K). SOUHY has more cash in the bank: 1.56B vs. CLLXF (6.71M). CLLXF has less debt than SOUHY: CLLXF (74.7K) vs SOUHY (1.86B). SOUHY has higher revenues than CLLXF: SOUHY (8.96B) vs CLLXF (0).
CLLXFSOUHYCLLXF / SOUHY
Capitalization35.1M11.8B0%
EBITDA337K3.94B0%
Gain YTD-46.14817.172-269%
P/E Ratio1111.115.1621,533%
Revenue08.96B-
Total Cash6.71M1.56B0%
Total Debt74.7K1.86B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CLLXF vs SOUHY: Fundamental Ratings
CLLXF
SOUHY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7559
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
98
Overvalued
96
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8647
SMR RATING
1..100
9091
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7946
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2997
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a75

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SOUHY's Valuation (96) in the null industry is in the same range as CLLXF (98). This means that SOUHY’s stock grew similarly to CLLXF’s over the last 12 months.

SOUHY's Profit vs Risk Rating (47) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CLLXF (86). This means that SOUHY’s stock grew somewhat faster than CLLXF’s over the last 12 months.

CLLXF's SMR Rating (90) in the null industry is in the same range as SOUHY (91). This means that CLLXF’s stock grew similarly to SOUHY’s over the last 12 months.

SOUHY's Price Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CLLXF (79). This means that SOUHY’s stock grew somewhat faster than CLLXF’s over the last 12 months.

CLLXF's P/E Growth Rating (29) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for SOUHY (97). This means that CLLXF’s stock grew significantly faster than SOUHY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SOUHY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 26 days ago
68%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
71%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
SOUHY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
WM220.441.96
+0.90%
Waste Management
STWD19.450.05
+0.26%
Starwood Property Trust
NTLA16.00-0.06
-0.37%
Intellia Therapeutics
BRNS1.47-0.01
-0.68%
Barinthus Biotherapeutics plc
NATR13.86-0.36
-2.53%
Nature's Sunshine Products

CLLXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CLLXF and GSM have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CLLXF and GSM's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CLLXF
1D Price
Change %
CLLXF100%
+2.00%
GSM - CLLXF
29%
Poorly correlated
-7.26%
TECK - CLLXF
26%
Poorly correlated
+4.01%
SOUHY - CLLXF
26%
Poorly correlated
+5.44%
ERO - CLLXF
25%
Poorly correlated
+5.44%
SCCO - CLLXF
22%
Poorly correlated
+3.66%
More

SOUHY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SOUHY has been loosely correlated with BHP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SOUHY jumps, then BHP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SOUHY
1D Price
Change %
SOUHY100%
+5.44%
BHP - SOUHY
62%
Loosely correlated
+3.24%
GLNCY - SOUHY
55%
Loosely correlated
+4.55%
RIO - SOUHY
55%
Loosely correlated
+3.28%
FCX - SOUHY
54%
Loosely correlated
+3.65%
HBM - SOUHY
53%
Loosely correlated
+7.76%
More