Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLMPX vs FCMAX
CLMPX vs FCMAX Comparison
Open Charts CLMPX vs FCMAX
CLMPX vs FCMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLMPX vs. FCMAX commentary
Sep 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLMPX is a Hold and FCMAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCMAX has more cash in the bank: 1.84B vs. CLMPX (301M). CLMPX pays higher dividends than FCMAX: CLMPX (3.59) vs FCMAX (2.79). CLMPX was incepted earlier than FCMAX: CLMPX (40 years) vs FCMAX (24 years). CLMPX (0.79) and FCMAX (0.76) have similar cost to investors . CLMPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 20.00 vs. FCMAX (19.00). FCMAX initial investment is less costly to investors than CLMPX (3%) vs CLMPX (3%). FCMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CLMPX: FCMAX (0) vs CLMPX (2000). CLMPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.48 vs. FCMAX (2.78). FCMAX return over 5 years is better than : 0.78 vs. CLMPX (-2.86).
| CLMPX | FCMAX | CLMPX / FCMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.76 | 97% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.76 | 104% |
| Fund Existence | 40 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.248 | -1.105 | 22% |
| Front Load | 3% | 4% | 75% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 301M | 1.84B | 16% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.59 | 2.79 | 129% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.48 | 2.78 | 161% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.48 | 9.72 | 128% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.86 | 0.78 | -368% |
| Returns for 10 years | 8.21 | 13.73 | 60% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement