Advertisement
CLNN vs PAVS
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLNN is a Hold and PAVS is a Hold.
CLNN's MACD Histogram just turned positive
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for CLNN turned positive on October 21, 2026. Looking at past instances where CLNN's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 40 of 45 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 89%.
Technical Analysis (Indicators)
Bullish Trend Analysis
The RSI Indicator points to a transition from a downward trend to an upward trend -- in cases where CLNN's RSI Indicator exited the oversold zone, 37 of 44 resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 84%.
The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on October 22, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on CLNN as a result. In 77 of 90 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are 86%.
CLNN moved above its 50-day moving average on November 04, 2026 date and that indicates a change from a downward trend to an upward trend.
The 10-day moving average for CLNN crossed bullishly above the 50-day moving average on November 06, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted higher and could be considered a buy signal. In 12 of 14 past instances when the 10-day crossed above the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 86%.
Following a +11.65% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where CLNN advanced for three days, in 191 of 230 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 83%.
Bearish Trend Analysis
The Stochastic Oscillator may be shifting from an upward trend to a downward trend. In 46 of 48 cases where CLNN's Stochastic Oscillator exited the overbought zone, the price fell further within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 90%.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where CLNN declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 90%.
CLNN broke above its upper Bollinger Band on November 09, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.
The Aroon Indicator for CLNN entered a downward trend on October 27, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 14 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to outstanding earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 59 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating steady price growth. CLNN’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 95 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is significantly overvalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (-2.266) is normal, around the industry mean (6.914). P/E Ratio (-1.113) is within average values for comparable stocks, (7.137). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.000) is also within normal values, averaging (8.458). Dividend Yield (0.000) settles around the average of (0.049) among similar stocks. CLNN's P/S Ratio (222.222) is very high in comparison to the industry average of (5.003).
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating weak sales and an unprofitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. CLNN’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 92, placing this stock worse than average.
PAVS's MACD Histogram just turned positive
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for PAVS turned positive on October 27, 2026. Looking at past instances where PAVS's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 27 of 32 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 84%.
Technical Analysis (Indicators)
Bullish Trend Analysis
The RSI Indicator points to a transition from a downward trend to an upward trend -- in cases where PAVS's RSI Oscillator exited the oversold zone, 31 of 39 resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 79%.
The Stochastic Oscillator shows that the ticker has stayed in the oversold zone for 3 days. The price of this ticker is presumed to bounce back soon, since the longer the ticker stays in the oversold zone, the more promptly an upward trend is expected.
Following a +5.87% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where PAVS advanced for three days, in 134 of 170 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 79%.
Bearish Trend Analysis
The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on November 11, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on PAVS as a result. In 88 of 106 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 83%.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where PAVS declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 90%.
The Aroon Indicator for PAVS entered a downward trend on November 03, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 6 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is seriously undervalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: PAVS's P/B Ratio (0.106) is slightly lower than the industry average of (2.998). P/E Ratio (-0.121) is within average values for comparable stocks, (12.296). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.000) is also within normal values, averaging (0.949). PAVS's Dividend Yield (0.415) is considerably higher than the industry average of (0.057). P/S Ratio (0.002) is also within normal values, averaging (1.162).
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 15 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to outstanding earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 93 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating slightly worse than average price growth. PAVS’s price grows at a lower rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 96 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating weak sales and an unprofitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. PAVS’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 88, placing this stock worse than average.
CLNN | PAVS | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 19 | 46 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 95 Overvalued | 6 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | 96 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 59 | 93 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 14 | 15 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
PAVS's Valuation (6) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CLNN (95). This means that PAVS’s stock grew significantly faster than CLNN’s over the last 12 months.
PAVS's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as CLNN (100). This means that PAVS’s stock grew similarly to CLNN’s over the last 12 months.
PAVS's SMR Rating (96) in the null industry is in the same range as CLNN (100). This means that PAVS’s stock grew similarly to CLNN’s over the last 12 months.
CLNN's Price Growth Rating (59) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PAVS (93). This means that CLNN’s stock grew somewhat faster than PAVS’s over the last 12 months.
CLNN's P/E Growth Rating (14) in the null industry is in the same range as PAVS (15). This means that CLNN’s stock grew similarly to PAVS’s over the last 12 months.
| CLNN | PAVS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | 1 day ago 79% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 84% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 1 day ago 83% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 89% | 1 day ago 84% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 1 day ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 79% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 90% | 1 day ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 90% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CLNN’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while PAVS’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- CLNN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- PAVS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CLNN’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PAVS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CLNN’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
- PAVS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
Price Growth
CLNN (@Food: Major Diversified) experienced а +16.98% price change this week, while PAVS (@Wholesale Distributors) price change was -11.08% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Major Diversified industry was -0.32%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.33%, and the average quarterly price growth was -15.83%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Wholesale Distributors industry was -5.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.44%, and the average quarterly price growth was +25.83%.
Reported Earning Dates
CLNN is expected to report earnings on Mar 29, 2027.
Industries' Descriptions
@Food: Major Diversified (-0.32% weekly)Companies in this industry usually make a diverse range of agricultural and/or processed food. Some prominent names in this segment are Mondelez International, which makes chocolates, biscuits, cookies etc. The Kraft Heinz Company specializes in ketchups, sauces, fruit drink pouches and many more. General Mills, Inc. sells flour and cereal. Kellogg is famous for its snacks and breakfast cereal. And so on down the line. As more and more consumers are looking for healthier options in food in recent years, several legacy food companies have responded by revamping brands to include organic and no-added-sugar versions, and/or acquiring healthy food firms, and even streamlining operations.
@Wholesale Distributors (-5.38% weekly)Companies in this industry handle the wholesale shipments for the manufacturer of a product. They have warehouses and distribution centers, and they ship products directly to the retailer. Digitization, increasing competition, emerging customer demand, and product innovation are some of shifts that the industry has been facing in recent times – something that is potentially creating needs/opportunities for business model revisions or transformations. Data, analytics, and technology are becoming increasingly important for whole distributors in anticipating and analyzing consumer needs, and therefore planning their business strategies accordingly. Fastenal Company, W.W. Grainger, Inc., Genuine Parts Company and Pool Corporation are some of the largest names in the business.
Advertisement
CLNN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CLNN has been loosely correlated with KYMR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CLNN jumps, then KYMR could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CLNN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CLNN | 100% | -4.88% | ||
| KYMR - CLNN | 36% Loosely correlated | -1.32% | ||
| VERA - CLNN | 35% Loosely correlated | +1.50% | ||
| KZIA - CLNN | 33% Poorly correlated | +0.41% | ||
| GOSS - CLNN | 30% Poorly correlated | +3.63% | ||
| BMRN - CLNN | 30% Poorly correlated | +2.10% | ||
More | ||||
PAVS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that PAVS and FRPT have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PAVS and FRPT's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PAVS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PAVS | 100% | -2.36% | ||
| FRPT - PAVS | 22% Poorly correlated | -0.14% | ||
| LWAY - PAVS | 20% Poorly correlated | +1.12% | ||
| NCRA - PAVS | 10% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| CLNN - PAVS | 9% Poorly correlated | -4.88% | ||
| DBI - PAVS | 8% Poorly correlated | -2.07% | ||
More | ||||