Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLPAX vs NLSAX
CLPAX vs NLSAX Comparison
Open Charts CLPAX vs NLSAX
CLPAX vs NLSAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLPAX vs. NLSAX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLPAX is a Buy and NLSAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSAX has more cash in the bank: 7.34B vs. CLPAX (12.9M). CLPAX (0.00) and NLSAX (0.00) have matching dividends . CLPAX was incepted earlier than NLSAX: CLPAX (13 years) vs NLSAX (15 years). CLPAX (2.62) is less costly to investors than NLSAX (1.64). CLPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. NLSAX (0.96). CLPAX (6%) and NLSAX (6%) have equivalent initial investment costs. NLSAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CLPAX: NLSAX (1000) vs CLPAX (2500). CLPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.93 vs. NLSAX (2.99). CLPAX return over 5 years is better than : 19.47 vs. NLSAX (14.80).
| CLPAX | NLSAX | CLPAX / NLSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.83 | 1.64 | 112% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.62 | 1.64 | 160% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.944 | 1.268 | 627% |
| Front Load | 6% | 6% | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.9M | 7.34B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.93 | 2.99 | 131% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.40 | 20.21 | 150% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.47 | 14.80 | 132% |
| Returns for 10 years | 69.19 | 55.80 | 124% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers