CLPBF vs QDEL
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLPBF is a StrongSell and QDEL is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CLPBF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileQDEL’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- CLPBF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- QDEL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CLPBF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while QDEL’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CLPBF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 7 bearish.
- QDEL’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
CLPBF (@Medical Specialties) experienced а -5.61% price change this week, while QDEL (@Medical Specialties) price change was +11.77% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical Specialties industry was -4.17%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.60%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.66%.
Reported Earning Dates
QDEL is expected to report earnings on Feb 12, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Medical Specialties (-4.17% weekly)Medical specialties are companies that make equipment used by the health care industry. Equipment manufactured and distributed by these companies include dialysis machines, blood analysis equipment, surgical equipment, dental instruments, and diagnostic tools, among other items. Large companies typically aim to produce and distribute high-quality products across a broad market spectrum. Smaller firms are more likely to specialize in a particular market segment. Due to the industry’s close association with medical treatments, they typically have low sensitivity to macroeconomic fluctuations. Within this industry, Abbott Laboratories, Medtronic Plc and Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. are some of the companies with multi-billion market capitalizations in the U.S. stock markets.
| CLPBF | QDEL | CLPBF / QDEL | |
| Capitalization | 26.5B | 3.14B | 843% |
| EBITDA | 7.65B | 607M | 1,260% |
| Gain YTD | -2.708 | -41.615 | 7% |
| P/E Ratio | 36.76 | 9.76 | 377% |
| Revenue | 24.1B | 3B | 804% |
| Total Cash | 881M | 167M | 528% |
| Total Debt | 22.2B | 2.61B | 849% |
CLPBF | QDEL | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 84 | 9 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 6 Undervalued | 57 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 33 | 97 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 77 | 48 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 76 | 15 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CLPBF's Valuation (6) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for QDEL (57) in the Medical Specialties industry. This means that CLPBF’s stock grew somewhat faster than QDEL’s over the last 12 months.
CLPBF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as QDEL (100) in the Medical Specialties industry. This means that CLPBF’s stock grew similarly to QDEL’s over the last 12 months.
CLPBF's SMR Rating (33) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for QDEL (97) in the Medical Specialties industry. This means that CLPBF’s stock grew somewhat faster than QDEL’s over the last 12 months.
QDEL's Price Growth Rating (48) in the Medical Specialties industry is in the same range as CLPBF (77) in the null industry. This means that QDEL’s stock grew similarly to CLPBF’s over the last 12 months.
QDEL's P/E Growth Rating (15) in the Medical Specialties industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CLPBF (76) in the null industry. This means that QDEL’s stock grew somewhat faster than CLPBF’s over the last 12 months.
| CLPBF | QDEL | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 48% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 57% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 60% | 2 days ago 63% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 53% | 2 days ago 64% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 50% | 2 days ago 74% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 52% | 2 days ago 74% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 24 days ago 61% | 7 days ago 71% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 55% | 14 days ago 78% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 54% | N/A |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| BUFT | 22.46 | 0.03 | +0.13% |
| FT Vest Buffered Allctn Dfnsv ETF | |||
| RATE | 19.69 | N/A | N/A |
| Global X Interest Rate Hedge ETF | |||
| JULZ | 44.15 | -0.01 | -0.02% |
| Trueshares Structured Outcome July ETF | |||
| HYBB | 46.52 | -0.08 | -0.17% |
| iShares BB Rated Corporate Bond ETF | |||
| IWL | 148.99 | -0.98 | -0.65% |
| iShares Russell Top 200 ETF | |||
CLPBF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CLPBF has been loosely correlated with CLPBY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CLPBF jumps, then CLPBY could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CLPBF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CLPBF | 100% | N/A | ||
| CLPBY - CLPBF | 38% Loosely correlated | -1.90% | ||
| AHICF - CLPBF | 26% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| WILLF - CLPBF | 22% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| QDEL - CLPBF | 20% Poorly correlated | -1.85% | ||
| ESLOY - CLPBF | 20% Poorly correlated | -0.51% | ||
More | ||||
QDEL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QDEL has been loosely correlated with IQV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if QDEL jumps, then IQV could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QDEL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QDEL | 100% | -1.85% | ||
| IQV - QDEL | 45% Loosely correlated | -0.23% | ||
| CERS - QDEL | 42% Loosely correlated | -6.11% | ||
| TWST - QDEL | 40% Loosely correlated | -0.06% | ||
| ILMN - QDEL | 37% Loosely correlated | -0.89% | ||
| IART - QDEL | 37% Loosely correlated | -2.87% | ||
More | ||||