It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CLPS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileINOD’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CLPS’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while INOD’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).
CLPS (@Information Technology Services) experienced а -0.88% price change this week, while INOD (@Information Technology Services) price change was -13.17% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Information Technology Services industry was -1.83%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.87%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.55%.
CLPS is expected to report earnings on Mar 03, 2023.
INOD is expected to report earnings on May 08, 2025.
The industry, whose total market cap runs into trillions, makes hardware/software that allows data to be stored, retrieved, transmitted, and manipulated on computers. With the ever-increasing relevance of data, the information technology (IT) industry has gained momentous growth over the years, and continues to thrive on innovation. Some of the behemoths in the industry are International Business Machines Corporation, Accenture, and VMware, Inc.
CLPS | INOD | CLPS / INOD | |
Capitalization | 31.2M | 985M | 3% |
EBITDA | -1.29M | 20.5M | -6% |
Gain YTD | -4.265 | -14.094 | 30% |
P/E Ratio | N/A | 55.66 | - |
Revenue | 143M | 137M | 104% |
Total Cash | N/A | 26.4M | - |
Total Debt | 26.2M | 4.88M | 537% |
CLPS | INOD | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 10 | 59 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 71 Overvalued | 75 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 8 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 90 | 17 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 45 | 35 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 40 | 96 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 | 45 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CLPS's Valuation (71) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as INOD (75) in the Data Processing Services industry. This means that CLPS’s stock grew similarly to INOD’s over the last 12 months.
INOD's Profit vs Risk Rating (8) in the Data Processing Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for CLPS (100) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that INOD’s stock grew significantly faster than CLPS’s over the last 12 months.
INOD's SMR Rating (17) in the Data Processing Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for CLPS (90) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that INOD’s stock grew significantly faster than CLPS’s over the last 12 months.
INOD's Price Growth Rating (35) in the Data Processing Services industry is in the same range as CLPS (45) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that INOD’s stock grew similarly to CLPS’s over the last 12 months.
CLPS's P/E Growth Rating (40) in the Information Technology Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for INOD (96) in the Data Processing Services industry. This means that CLPS’s stock grew somewhat faster than INOD’s over the last 12 months.
CLPS | INOD | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 8 days ago89% | 8 days ago86% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 8 days ago88% | 8 days ago83% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 8 days ago85% | 8 days ago80% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 8 days ago82% | 8 days ago81% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 8 days ago79% | 8 days ago77% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago79% | 24 days ago89% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 13 days ago85% | 8 days ago83% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 8 days ago75% | 8 days ago90% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
TQSAX | 22.89 | 0.28 | +1.24% |
T. Rowe Price Integrated US SMCC Eq Adv | |||
FVCSX | 33.89 | 0.38 | +1.13% |
Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies C | |||
BRLVX | 23.27 | 0.25 | +1.09% |
American Beacon Man Lg Cp Value R5 | |||
RYTIX | 205.22 | 1.03 | +0.50% |
Rydex Technology Inv | |||
MIGHX | 41.08 | 0.11 | +0.27% |
MFS Massachusetts Inv Gr Stk R3 |
A.I.dvisor tells us that CLPS and AI have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CLPS and AI's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CLPS | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
CLPS | 100% | +0.89% | ||
AI - CLPS | 25% Poorly correlated | -0.19% | ||
INOD - CLPS | 24% Poorly correlated | +1.56% | ||
AUR - CLPS | 21% Poorly correlated | +2.23% | ||
GLOB - CLPS | 21% Poorly correlated | -0.07% | ||
ACN - CLPS | 21% Poorly correlated | -0.04% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, INOD has been loosely correlated with G. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if INOD jumps, then G could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To INOD | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
INOD | 100% | +1.56% | ||
G - INOD | 34% Loosely correlated | -0.25% | ||
AI - INOD | 34% Loosely correlated | -0.19% | ||
KD - INOD | 32% Poorly correlated | +2.15% | ||
TASK - INOD | 30% Poorly correlated | +1.33% | ||
AUR - INOD | 29% Poorly correlated | +2.23% | ||
More |