Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLPYX vs RWMFX
CLPYX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts CLPYX vs RWMFX
CLPYX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLPYX vs. RWMFX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLPYX is a Buy and RWMFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. CLPYX (2.9B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than CLPYX: RWMFX (1.41) vs CLPYX (0.99). CLPYX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: CLPYX (10 years) vs RWMFX (24 years). RWMFX (0.31) is less costly to investors than CLPYX (0.20). RWMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. CLPYX (5.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than CLPYX: RWMFX (250) vs CLPYX (1000000). RWMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.09 vs. CLPYX (-2.08). RWMFX return over 5 years is better than : 27.39 vs. CLPYX (-7.02).
| CLPYX | RWMFX | CLPYX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.20 | 0.31 | 65% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.20 | 0.31 | 65% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.588 | 4.508 | 168% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.9B | 218B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.99 | 1.41 | 70% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.08 | 2.09 | -100% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.09 | 30.24 | 57% |
| Returns for 5 years | -7.02 | 27.39 | -26% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 82.36 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers