Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLPYX vs RWMFX
CLPYX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts CLPYX vs RWMFX
CLPYX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLPYX vs. RWMFX commentary
Jun 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLPYX is a Hold and RWMFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. CLPYX (3.06B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than CLPYX: RWMFX (1.40) vs CLPYX (0.95). CLPYX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: CLPYX (9 years) vs RWMFX (24 years). RWMFX (0.31) is less costly to investors than CLPYX (0.20). RWMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. CLPYX (5.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than CLPYX: RWMFX (250) vs CLPYX (1000000). CLPYX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.05 vs. RWMFX (8.15). RWMFX return over 5 years is better than : 27.55 vs. CLPYX (0.43).
| CLPYX | RWMFX | CLPYX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.20 | 0.31 | 65% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.20 | 0.31 | 65% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.285 | 1.616 | 636% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.06B | 218B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.95 | 1.40 | 68% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.05 | 8.15 | 135% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.52 | 30.58 | 77% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.43 | 27.55 | 2% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 82.86 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement