Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLPYX vs RWMFX
CLPYX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts CLPYX vs RWMFX
CLPYX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLPYX vs. RWMFX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLPYX is a Hold and RWMFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 219B vs. CLPYX (3.06B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than CLPYX: RWMFX (1.44) vs CLPYX (1.02). CLPYX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: CLPYX (9 years) vs RWMFX (24 years). RWMFX (0.31) is less costly to investors than CLPYX (0.20). RWMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. CLPYX (5.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than CLPYX: RWMFX (250) vs CLPYX (1000000). RWMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.76 vs. CLPYX (2.85). RWMFX return over 5 years is better than : 28.02 vs. CLPYX (-5.41).
| CLPYX | RWMFX | CLPYX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.20 | 0.31 | 65% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.20 | 0.31 | 65% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.183 | 3.858 | 186% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.06B | 219B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.02 | 1.44 | 70% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.85 | 5.76 | 50% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.79 | 29.17 | 54% |
| Returns for 5 years | -5.41 | 28.02 | -19% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 77.65 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers