Ad is loading...
CLQZX vs GFACX
CLQZX vs GFACX Comparison
Open Charts CLQZX vs GFACX
Columbia Disciplined Growth Inst
Price$10.13
Change+$0.09 (+0.90%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets271.26M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$60.57
Change+$0.61 (+1.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets275.25B
CLQZX vs GFACX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLQZX vs. GFACX commentary
Apr 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLQZX is a StrongBuy and GFACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 275B vs. CLQZX (271M). CLQZX (0.00) and GFACX (0.00) have matching dividends . CLQZX was incepted earlier than GFACX: CLQZX (15 years) vs GFACX (24 years). GFACX (1.36) is less costly to investors than CLQZX (0.92). CLQZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 68.00 vs. GFACX (25.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than CLQZX: GFACX (250) vs CLQZX (2000). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.11 vs. CLQZX (-5.37). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 59.73 vs. CLQZX (34.07).
| CLQZX | GFACX | CLQZX / GFACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 1.36 | 60% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 1.36 | 68% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -9.874 | -5.003 | 197% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 271M | 275B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.37 | -1.11 | 484% |
| Returns for 3 years | -0.89 | 2.31 | -38% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.07 | 59.73 | 57% |
| Returns for 10 years | 10.31 | 45.29 | 23% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...