Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLQZX vs GFACX
CLQZX vs GFACX Comparison
Open Charts CLQZX vs GFACX
Columbia Disciplined Growth Inst
Price$12.95
Change-$0.06 (-0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets311.8M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$75.53
Change+$0.03 (+0.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets341.24B
CLQZX vs GFACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLQZX vs. GFACX commentary
Oct 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLQZX is a Buy and GFACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 341B vs. CLQZX (312M). CLQZX (0.00) and GFACX (0.00) have matching dividends . CLQZX was incepted earlier than GFACX: CLQZX (15 years) vs GFACX (25 years). GFACX (1.36) is less costly to investors than CLQZX (0.92). CLQZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 68.00 vs. GFACX (25.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than CLQZX: GFACX (250) vs CLQZX (2000). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.49 vs. CLQZX (11.73). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 37.58 vs. CLQZX (21.16).
| CLQZX | GFACX | CLQZX / GFACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 1.36 | 60% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 1.36 | 68% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.248 | 18.460 | 88% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 312M | 341B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.73 | 13.49 | 87% |
| Returns for 3 years | 56.59 | 60.60 | 93% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.16 | 37.58 | 56% |
| Returns for 10 years | 47.06 | 86.91 | 54% |