Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLQZX vs GFACX
CLQZX vs GFACX Comparison
Open Charts CLQZX vs GFACX
CLQZX vs GFACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLQZX vs. GFACX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLQZX is a Buy and GFACX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. CLQZX (303M). CLQZX (0.00) and GFACX (0.00) have matching dividends . CLQZX was incepted earlier than GFACX: CLQZX (16 years) vs GFACX (25 years). GFACX (1.35) is less costly to investors than CLQZX (0.90). CLQZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. GFACX (32.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than CLQZX: GFACX (250) vs CLQZX (2000). CLQZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.57 vs. GFACX (-0.98). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 3.92 vs. CLQZX (-1.20).
| CLQZX | GFACX | CLQZX / GFACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 1.35 | 60% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 1.35 | 67% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.734 | 5.156 | 14% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 303M | 357B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.57 | -0.98 | -263% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.91 | 27.74 | 104% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.20 | 3.92 | -31% |
| Returns for 10 years | 46.65 | 76.09 | 61% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement