Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLQZX vs GFACX
CLQZX vs GFACX Comparison
Open Charts CLQZX vs GFACX
CLQZX vs GFACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLQZX vs. GFACX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLQZX is a Buy and GFACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. CLQZX (317M). CLQZX (0.00) and GFACX (0.00) have matching dividends . CLQZX was incepted earlier than GFACX: CLQZX (16 years) vs GFACX (25 years). GFACX (1.35) is less costly to investors than CLQZX (0.90). CLQZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. GFACX (32.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than CLQZX: GFACX (250) vs CLQZX (2000). CLQZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.13 vs. GFACX (1.73). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 6.34 vs. CLQZX (3.63).
| CLQZX | GFACX | CLQZX / GFACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 1.35 | 60% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 1.35 | 67% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.649 | 6.746 | 69% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 317M | 357B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.13 | 1.73 | 586% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.91 | 31.09 | 115% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.63 | 6.34 | 57% |
| Returns for 10 years | 53.61 | 78.97 | 68% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement