Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLQZX vs RGACX
CLQZX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts CLQZX vs RGACX
Columbia Disciplined Growth Inst
Price$12.77
Change+$0.14 (+1.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets305.77M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$85.19
Change+$0.60 (+0.71%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets337.84B
CLQZX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLQZX vs. RGACX commentary
Sep 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLQZX is a Buy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 338B vs. CLQZX (306M). RGACX pays higher dividends than CLQZX: RGACX (0.07) vs CLQZX (0.00). CLQZX was incepted earlier than RGACX: CLQZX (15 years) vs RGACX (23 years). RGACX (0.94) and CLQZX (0.92) have similar cost to investors . CLQZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 68.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than CLQZX: RGACX (250) vs CLQZX (2000). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.32 vs. CLQZX (11.38). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 43.39 vs. CLQZX (18.17).
| CLQZX | RGACX | CLQZX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 0.94 | 86% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 0.94 | 98% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.375 | 17.502 | 76% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 306M | 338B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.38 | 16.32 | 70% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.18 | 60.40 | 83% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.17 | 43.39 | 42% |
| Returns for 10 years | 42.63 | 99.34 | 43% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement