Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLQZX vs RGACX
CLQZX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts CLQZX vs RGACX
Columbia Disciplined Growth Inst
Price$12.95
Change-$0.06 (-0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets311.8M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$85.54
Change+$0.03 (+0.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets341.24B
CLQZX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLQZX vs. RGACX commentary
Oct 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLQZX is a Buy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 341B vs. CLQZX (312M). RGACX pays higher dividends than CLQZX: RGACX (0.07) vs CLQZX (0.00). CLQZX was incepted earlier than RGACX: CLQZX (15 years) vs RGACX (23 years). RGACX (0.94) and CLQZX (0.92) have similar cost to investors . CLQZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 68.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than CLQZX: RGACX (250) vs CLQZX (2000). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.15 vs. CLQZX (11.73). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 45.12 vs. CLQZX (21.16).
| CLQZX | RGACX | CLQZX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 0.94 | 86% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 0.94 | 98% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.248 | 18.822 | 86% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 312M | 341B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.73 | 15.15 | 77% |
| Returns for 3 years | 56.59 | 66.19 | 85% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.16 | 45.12 | 47% |
| Returns for 10 years | 47.06 | 103.64 | 45% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement