Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLQZX vs RGACX
CLQZX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts CLQZX vs RGACX
CLQZX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLQZX vs. RGACX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLQZX is a Buy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. CLQZX (317M). CLQZX (0.00) and RGACX (0.00) have matching dividends . CLQZX was incepted earlier than RGACX: CLQZX (16 years) vs RGACX (24 years). RGACX (0.93) and CLQZX (0.90) have similar cost to investors . CLQZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RGACX (32.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than CLQZX: RGACX (250) vs CLQZX (2000). CLQZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.13 vs. RGACX (3.68). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 13.46 vs. CLQZX (3.63).
| CLQZX | RGACX | CLQZX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 0.93 | 87% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 0.93 | 97% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.649 | 6.959 | 67% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 317M | 357B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.13 | 3.68 | 275% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.91 | 37.13 | 97% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.63 | 13.46 | 27% |
| Returns for 10 years | 53.61 | 97.58 | 55% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement