Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLQZX vs RGACX
CLQZX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts CLQZX vs RGACX
CLQZX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLQZX vs. RGACX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLQZX is a StrongBuy and RGACX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 342B vs. CLQZX (312M). CLQZX (0.00) and RGACX (0.00) have matching dividends . CLQZX was incepted earlier than RGACX: CLQZX (16 years) vs RGACX (24 years). RGACX (0.93) and CLQZX (0.90) have similar cost to investors . CLQZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RGACX (32.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than CLQZX: RGACX (250) vs CLQZX (2000). CLQZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.75 vs. RGACX (4.90). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 14.75 vs. CLQZX (0.79).
| CLQZX | RGACX | CLQZX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 0.93 | 87% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 0.93 | 97% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.486 | 9.193 | 49% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 312M | 342B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.75 | 4.90 | 138% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.92 | 44.95 | 91% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.79 | 14.75 | 5% |
| Returns for 10 years | 50.52 | 96.44 | 52% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement