Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLQZX vs RGAHX
CLQZX vs RGAHX Comparison
Open Charts CLQZX vs RGAHX
CLQZX vs RGAHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLQZX vs. RGAHX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLQZX is a Buy and RGAHX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. CLQZX (303M). RGAHX pays higher dividends than CLQZX: RGAHX (0.41) vs CLQZX (0.00). CLQZX was incepted earlier than RGAHX: CLQZX (16 years) vs RGAHX (11 years). CLQZX (0.90) is less costly to investors than RGAHX (0.44). CLQZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RGAHX (32.00). RGAHX has a lower initial minimum investment than CLQZX: RGAHX (250) vs CLQZX (2000). CLQZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.57 vs. RGAHX (1.64). RGAHX return over 5 years is better than : 13.85 vs. CLQZX (-1.20).
| CLQZX | RGAHX | CLQZX / RGAHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 0.44 | 184% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 0.44 | 205% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.734 | 5.692 | 13% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 303M | 357B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.41 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.57 | 1.64 | 157% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.91 | 36.31 | 80% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.20 | 13.85 | -9% |
| Returns for 10 years | 46.65 | 99.57 | 47% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement