CLS
Price
$97.55
Change
+$2.10 (+2.20%)
Updated
Dec 23, 04:59 PM (EDT)
37 days until earnings call
LGL
Price
$5.95
Change
-$0.23 (-3.72%)
Updated
Dec 23, 02:19 PM (EDT)
105 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

CLS vs LGL

Header iconCLS vs LGL Comparison
Open Charts CLS vs LGLBanner chart's image
Celestica
Price$97.55
Change+$2.10 (+2.20%)
Volume$5.14K
CapitalizationN/A
LGL Group (The)
Price$5.95
Change-$0.23 (-3.72%)
Volume$150
CapitalizationN/A
CLS vs LGL Comparison Chart
Loading...
CLS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LGL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CLS vs. LGL commentary
Dec 24, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLS is a Hold and LGL is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 24, 2024
Stock price -- (CLS: $95.45 vs. LGL: $6.18)
Brand notoriety: CLS and LGL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Electronic Components industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CLS: 83% vs. LGL: 219%
Market capitalization -- CLS: $11.13B vs. LGL: $33.21M
CLS [@Electronic Components] is valued at $11.13B. LGL’s [@Electronic Components] market capitalization is $33.21M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electronic Components] industry ranges from $85.09B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Electronic Components] industry is $5.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CLS’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileLGL’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CLS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • LGL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CLS is a better buy in the long-term than LGL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CLS’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LGL’s TA Score has 7 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CLS’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • LGL’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LGL is a better buy in the short-term than CLS.

Price Growth

CLS (@Electronic Components) experienced а -3.78% price change this week, while LGL (@Electronic Components) price change was +0.32% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Components industry was +0.74%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +10.67%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.22%.

Reported Earning Dates

CLS is expected to report earnings on Jan 29, 2025.

LGL is expected to report earnings on Apr 07, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Electronic Components (+0.74% weekly)

The Electronic Components industry produces electronic equipment for industries and consumer electronics products, such as mobile devices, televisions, and circuit boards. TE Connectivity Ltd, for example, is a company that designs and manufactures connectivity and sensor products for harsh environments in various industries, such as automotive, industrial equipment, aerospace, and oil & gas. Another major player, Corning Inc., makes advanced optics including end-to-end fiber and wireless solutions for communications networks along with various other technologies catering to industrial and scientific applications.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLS($11.1B) has a higher market cap than LGL($33.2M). LGL has higher P/E ratio than CLS: LGL (88.29) vs CLS (30.21). CLS YTD gains are higher at: 225.990 vs. LGL (0.651). CLS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 710M vs. LGL (-1.31M). CLS has more cash in the bank: 398M vs. LGL (41.6M). LGL has less debt than CLS: LGL (587K) vs CLS (941M). CLS has higher revenues than LGL: CLS (9.24B) vs LGL (2.02M).
CLSLGLCLS / LGL
Capitalization11.1B33.2M33,434%
EBITDA710M-1.31M-54,364%
Gain YTD225.9900.65134,690%
P/E Ratio30.2188.2934%
Revenue9.24B2.02M457,702%
Total Cash398M41.6M957%
Total Debt941M587K160,307%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CLS vs LGL: Fundamental Ratings
CLS
LGL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
71
Overvalued
75
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
395
SMR RATING
1..100
4489
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3551
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1496
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
1250

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CLS's Valuation (71) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as LGL (75) in the Electronic Equipment Or Instruments industry. This means that CLS’s stock grew similarly to LGL’s over the last 12 months.

CLS's Profit vs Risk Rating (3) in the Electronic Components industry is significantly better than the same rating for LGL (95) in the Electronic Equipment Or Instruments industry. This means that CLS’s stock grew significantly faster than LGL’s over the last 12 months.

CLS's SMR Rating (44) in the Electronic Components industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LGL (89) in the Electronic Equipment Or Instruments industry. This means that CLS’s stock grew somewhat faster than LGL’s over the last 12 months.

CLS's Price Growth Rating (35) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as LGL (51) in the Electronic Equipment Or Instruments industry. This means that CLS’s stock grew similarly to LGL’s over the last 12 months.

CLS's P/E Growth Rating (14) in the Electronic Components industry is significantly better than the same rating for LGL (96) in the Electronic Equipment Or Instruments industry. This means that CLS’s stock grew significantly faster than LGL’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CLSLGL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
66%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
62%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
68%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CLS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LGL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VTV170.291.97
+1.17%
Vanguard Value ETF
CARZ58.020.61
+1.06%
First Trust S-Network Fut Vhcl&Tech ETF
SMMD68.370.71
+1.05%
iShares Russell 2500 ETF
BMVP47.250.49
+1.04%
Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-factor ETF
JPEM53.200.13
+0.25%
JPMorgan Diversified Return EMkts Eq ETF

LGL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LGL and DAIO have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LGL and DAIO's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LGL
1D Price
Change %
LGL100%
+4.62%
DAIO - LGL
23%
Poorly correlated
+1.82%
KULR - LGL
21%
Poorly correlated
+31.70%
FN - LGL
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.66%
CLS - LGL
20%
Poorly correlated
+2.58%
OSIS - LGL
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.06%
More