CLS
Price
$159.26
Change
+$4.36 (+2.81%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
18.38B
23 days until earnings call
LGL
Price
$6.96
Change
-$0.19 (-2.66%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
37.51M
45 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CLS vs LGL

Header iconCLS vs LGL Comparison
Open Charts CLS vs LGLBanner chart's image
Celestica
Price$159.26
Change+$4.36 (+2.81%)
Volume$2.23M
Capitalization18.38B
LGL Group (The)
Price$6.96
Change-$0.19 (-2.66%)
Volume$21.82K
Capitalization37.51M
CLS vs LGL Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CLS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LGL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CLS vs. LGL commentary
Jul 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLS is a StrongBuy and LGL is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 05, 2025
Stock price -- (CLS: $159.26 vs. LGL: $6.96)
Brand notoriety: CLS and LGL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Electronic Components industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CLS: 64% vs. LGL: 105%
Market capitalization -- CLS: $18.38B vs. LGL: $37.51M
CLS [@Electronic Components] is valued at $18.38B. LGL’s [@Electronic Components] market capitalization is $37.51M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electronic Components] industry ranges from $120.31B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Electronic Components] industry is $6.61B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CLS’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileLGL’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CLS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • LGL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CLS is a better buy in the long-term than LGL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CLS’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LGL’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CLS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • LGL’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LGL is a better buy in the short-term than CLS.

Price Growth

CLS (@Electronic Components) experienced а +6.07% price change this week, while LGL (@Electronic Components) price change was -3.73% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Components industry was +1.58%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.72%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.68%.

Reported Earning Dates

CLS is expected to report earnings on Jul 28, 2025.

LGL is expected to report earnings on Aug 19, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Electronic Components (+1.58% weekly)

The Electronic Components industry produces electronic equipment for industries and consumer electronics products, such as mobile devices, televisions, and circuit boards. TE Connectivity Ltd, for example, is a company that designs and manufactures connectivity and sensor products for harsh environments in various industries, such as automotive, industrial equipment, aerospace, and oil & gas. Another major player, Corning Inc., makes advanced optics including end-to-end fiber and wireless solutions for communications networks along with various other technologies catering to industrial and scientific applications.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLS($18.4B) has a higher market cap than LGL($37.5M). LGL has higher P/E ratio than CLS: LGL (87.00) vs CLS (44.49). CLS YTD gains are higher at: 72.546 vs. LGL (16.583). CLS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 746M vs. LGL (683K). CLS has more cash in the bank: 303M vs. LGL (41.9M). LGL has less debt than CLS: LGL (587K) vs CLS (942M). CLS has higher revenues than LGL: CLS (10.1B) vs LGL (4.32M).
CLSLGLCLS / LGL
Capitalization18.4B37.5M49,067%
EBITDA746M683K109,224%
Gain YTD72.54616.583437%
P/E Ratio44.4987.0051%
Revenue10.1B4.32M233,688%
Total Cash303M41.9M723%
Total Debt942M587K160,477%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CLS vs LGL: Fundamental Ratings
CLS
LGL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
443
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
81
Overvalued
77
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1934
SMR RATING
1..100
3888
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3551
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1094
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
2575

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LGL's Valuation (77) in the Electronic Equipment Or Instruments industry is in the same range as CLS (81) in the Electronic Components industry. This means that LGL’s stock grew similarly to CLS’s over the last 12 months.

CLS's Profit vs Risk Rating (19) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as LGL (34) in the Electronic Equipment Or Instruments industry. This means that CLS’s stock grew similarly to LGL’s over the last 12 months.

CLS's SMR Rating (38) in the Electronic Components industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LGL (88) in the Electronic Equipment Or Instruments industry. This means that CLS’s stock grew somewhat faster than LGL’s over the last 12 months.

CLS's Price Growth Rating (35) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as LGL (51) in the Electronic Equipment Or Instruments industry. This means that CLS’s stock grew similarly to LGL’s over the last 12 months.

CLS's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the Electronic Components industry is significantly better than the same rating for LGL (94) in the Electronic Equipment Or Instruments industry. This means that CLS’s stock grew significantly faster than LGL’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CLSLGL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend about 1 month ago
73%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CLS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LGL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MVPL32.560.59
+1.84%
Miller Value Ptnrs Leverage ETF
DTEC50.040.70
+1.42%
ALPS Disruptive Technologies ETF
EQWL111.810.63
+0.57%
Invesco S&P 100 Equal Weight ETF
INCO64.900.26
+0.40%
Columbia India Consumer ETF
SYFI35.840.02
+0.06%
AB Short Duration High Yield ETF

CLS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CLS has been closely correlated with APH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CLS jumps, then APH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CLS
1D Price
Change %
CLS100%
+2.81%
APH - CLS
73%
Closely correlated
+0.95%
FLEX - CLS
71%
Closely correlated
+1.87%
JBL - CLS
65%
Loosely correlated
+1.86%
FN - CLS
65%
Loosely correlated
+2.02%
SANM - CLS
62%
Loosely correlated
+1.09%
More

LGL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LGL has been loosely correlated with DAIO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LGL jumps, then DAIO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LGL
1D Price
Change %
LGL100%
-2.66%
DAIO - LGL
37%
Loosely correlated
+4.98%
VICR - LGL
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.92%
KULR - LGL
21%
Poorly correlated
+3.35%
FN - LGL
20%
Poorly correlated
+2.02%
CLS - LGL
20%
Poorly correlated
+2.81%
More