Ad is loading...
CLSE vs FTLS
CLSE vs FTLS Comparison
Open Charts CLSE vs FTLS
Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF
Price$20.15
Change-$0.95 (-4.50%)
Volume$265
Net Assets171.13M
First Trust Long/Short Equity ETF
Price$60.77
Change-$2.15 (-3.42%)
Volume$199
Net Assets1.93B
CLSE vs FTLS Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLSE vs. FTLS commentary
Apr 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLSE is a Hold and FTLS is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTLS has more net assets: 1.93B vs. CLSE (171M). FTLS has a higher annual dividend yield than CLSE: FTLS (-4.166) vs CLSE (-7.900). CLSE was incepted earlier than FTLS: CLSE (15 years) vs FTLS (11 years). FTLS (1.46) has a lower expense ratio than CLSE (1.55). FTLS (235.00) and CLSE (225.05) have matching turnover.
| CLSE | FTLS | CLSE / FTLS | |
| Gain YTD | -7.900 | -4.166 | 190% |
| Net Assets | 171M | 1.93B | 9% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.55 | 1.46 | 106% |
| Turnover | 225.05 | 235.00 | 96% |
| Yield | 0.98 | 1.58 | 62% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 11 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CLSE | FTLS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 88% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 65% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 59% | 2 days ago 63% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 68% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 63% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 84% | 16 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 63% | 8 days ago 65% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 63% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CLSE and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CLSE has been loosely correlated with CDNS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CLSE jumps, then CDNS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CLSE | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CLSE | 100% | -3.39% | ||
| CDNS - CLSE | 65% Loosely correlated | -6.05% | ||
| MSFT - CLSE | 61% Loosely correlated | -2.36% | ||
| KNF - CLSE | 61% Loosely correlated | -4.80% | ||
| VRT - CLSE | 61% Loosely correlated | -12.50% | ||
| ANET - CLSE | 59% Loosely correlated | -11.09% | ||
More | ||||
FTLS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FTLS has been loosely correlated with MSFT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FTLS jumps, then MSFT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FTLS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FTLS | 100% | -1.70% | ||
| MSFT - FTLS | 65% Loosely correlated | -2.36% | ||
| AMZN - FTLS | 62% Loosely correlated | -8.98% | ||
| NVT - FTLS | 61% Loosely correlated | -12.03% | ||
| ANET - FTLS | 60% Loosely correlated | -11.09% | ||
| TPG - FTLS | 58% Loosely correlated | -14.69% | ||
More | ||||