Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLSE vs FTLS
CLSE vs FTLS Comparison
Open Charts CLSE vs FTLS
Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF
Price$26.19
Change+$0.09 (+0.34%)
Volume$57.22K
Net Assets240.94M
First Trust Long/Short Equity ETF
Price$70.22
Change+$0.75 (+1.08%)
Volume$253.29K
Net Assets2.09B
CLSE vs FTLS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLSE vs. FTLS commentary
Nov 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLSE is a Hold and FTLS is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTLS has more net assets: 2.09B vs. CLSE (241M). CLSE has a higher annual dividend yield than FTLS: CLSE (14.317) vs FTLS (7.583). CLSE was incepted earlier than FTLS: CLSE (16 years) vs FTLS (11 years). FTLS (1.38) and CLSE (1.44) have comparable expense ratios . FTLS (235.00) and CLSE (225.05) have matching turnover.
| CLSE | FTLS | CLSE / FTLS | |
| Gain YTD | 14.317 | 7.583 | 189% |
| Net Assets | 241M | 2.09B | 12% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.44 | 1.38 | 104% |
| Turnover | 225.05 | 235.00 | 96% |
| Yield | 0.79 | 1.18 | 67% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 11 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CLSE | FTLS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 61% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 57% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 60% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 66% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 86% | 12 days ago 81% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 63% | 5 days ago 63% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 88% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 80% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| FSCS | 35.20 | 0.69 | +2.00% |
| First Trust SMID Capital Strength ETF | |||
| VPC | 18.25 | 0.20 | +1.14% |
| Virtus Private Credit ETF | |||
| CPNM | 25.65 | 0.05 | +0.18% |
| Calamos Nasdaq-100 Str Alt Prt ETF-Mar | |||
| BSMS | 23.49 | 0.02 | +0.09% |
| Invesco BulletShares 2028 Muncpl Bd ETF | |||
| BAB | 27.33 | -0.04 | -0.15% |
| Invesco Taxable Municipal Bond ETF | |||
CLSE and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CLSE has been closely correlated with MTZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CLSE jumps, then MTZ could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CLSE | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CLSE | 100% | +0.34% | ||
| MTZ - CLSE | 76% Closely correlated | +0.66% | ||
| VRT - CLSE | 72% Closely correlated | +0.14% | ||
| FIX - CLSE | 70% Closely correlated | +2.04% | ||
| NVDA - CLSE | 70% Closely correlated | -0.97% | ||
| STRL - CLSE | 69% Closely correlated | +0.17% | ||
More | ||||