Ad is loading...
CLSE vs FTLS
CLSE vs FTLS Comparison
Open Charts CLSE vs FTLS
Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF
Price$21.51
Change-$0.04 (-0.19%)
Volume$284
Net Assets160.89M
First Trust Long/Short Equity ETF
Price$62.84
Change-$0.26 (-0.41%)
Volume$114
Net Assets1.92B
CLSE vs FTLS Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLSE vs. FTLS commentary
Apr 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLSE is a StrongBuy and FTLS is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTLS has more net assets: 1.92B vs. CLSE (161M). FTLS has a higher annual dividend yield than CLSE: FTLS (-3.892) vs CLSE (-5.936). CLSE was incepted earlier than FTLS: CLSE (15 years) vs FTLS (11 years). FTLS (1.46) has a lower expense ratio than CLSE (1.55). FTLS (235.00) and CLSE (225.05) have matching turnover.
| CLSE | FTLS | CLSE / FTLS | |
| Gain YTD | -5.936 | -3.892 | 153% |
| Net Assets | 161M | 1.92B | 8% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.55 | 1.46 | 106% |
| Turnover | 225.05 | 235.00 | 96% |
| Yield | 0.98 | 1.58 | 62% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 11 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CLSE | FTLS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 80% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 62% | 4 days ago 57% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 81% | 4 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 79% | 4 days ago 82% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 87% | 4 days ago 83% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 75% | 4 days ago 65% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 84% | 4 days ago 81% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 64% | 21 days ago 65% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 81% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 68% | 4 days ago 65% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CLSE and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CLSE has been closely correlated with MTZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CLSE jumps, then MTZ could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CLSE | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CLSE | 100% | +0.51% | ||
| MTZ - CLSE | 73% Closely correlated | +1.86% | ||
| MRVL - CLSE | 69% Closely correlated | +2.77% | ||
| PRIM - CLSE | 69% Closely correlated | +1.87% | ||
| COHR - CLSE | 68% Closely correlated | +1.54% | ||
| CIEN - CLSE | 67% Closely correlated | +2.57% | ||
More | ||||
FTLS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FTLS has been closely correlated with JHG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FTLS jumps, then JHG could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FTLS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FTLS | 100% | +0.19% | ||
| JHG - FTLS | 73% Closely correlated | -0.36% | ||
| MS - FTLS | 73% Closely correlated | +0.35% | ||
| AXP - FTLS | 72% Closely correlated | -0.94% | ||
| SEIC - FTLS | 70% Closely correlated | -0.14% | ||
| ITT - FTLS | 69% Closely correlated | -0.17% | ||
More | ||||