Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLSE vs FTLS
CLSE vs FTLS Comparison
Open Charts CLSE vs FTLS
CLSE vs FTLS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLSE vs. FTLS commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLSE is a Hold and FTLS is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTLS has more net assets: 2.41B vs. CLSE (716M). CLSE has a higher annual dividend yield than FTLS: CLSE (26.052) vs FTLS (5.547). CLSE was incepted earlier than FTLS: CLSE (16 years) vs FTLS (12 years). FTLS (1.38) has a lower expense ratio than CLSE (1.52). CLSE has a higher turnover FTLS (235.00) vs FTLS (235.00).
| CLSE | FTLS | CLSE / FTLS | |
| Gain YTD | 26.052 | 5.547 | 470% |
| Net Assets | 716M | 2.41B | 30% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.52 | 1.38 | 110% |
| Turnover | 262.00 | 235.00 | 111% |
| Yield | 0.77 | 0.90 | 86% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 12 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CLSE | FTLS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 65% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 58% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 85% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 85% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 62% | 14 days ago 65% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 86% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
CLSE and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CLSE has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CLSE jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CLSE | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CLSE | 100% | +0.79% | ||
| LRCX - CLSE | 72% Closely correlated | +5.27% | ||
| MU - CLSE | 66% Loosely correlated | +6.82% | ||
| MTZ - CLSE | 65% Loosely correlated | +7.02% | ||
| FIX - CLSE | 65% Loosely correlated | +5.04% | ||
| CIEN - CLSE | 63% Loosely correlated | +7.50% | ||
More | ||||
FTLS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FTLS has been loosely correlated with MS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FTLS jumps, then MS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FTLS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FTLS | 100% | +0.48% | ||
| MS - FTLS | 55% Loosely correlated | +1.76% | ||
| ASML - FTLS | 55% Loosely correlated | -0.02% | ||
| ROK - FTLS | 54% Loosely correlated | +0.91% | ||
| GS - FTLS | 54% Loosely correlated | +0.89% | ||
| CAT - FTLS | 53% Loosely correlated | +3.70% | ||
More | ||||