Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLSE vs FTLS
CLSE vs FTLS Comparison
Open Charts CLSE vs FTLS
CLSE vs FTLS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLSE vs. FTLS commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLSE is a Buy and FTLS is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTLS has more net assets: 2.45B vs. CLSE (748M). CLSE has a higher annual dividend yield than FTLS: CLSE (24.662) vs FTLS (5.504). CLSE was incepted earlier than FTLS: CLSE (17 years) vs FTLS (12 years). FTLS (1.38) has a lower expense ratio than CLSE (1.52). CLSE has a higher turnover FTLS (235.00) vs FTLS (235.00).
| CLSE | FTLS | CLSE / FTLS | |
| Gain YTD | 24.662 | 5.504 | 448% |
| Net Assets | 748M | 2.45B | 31% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.52 | 1.38 | 110% |
| Turnover | 262.00 | 235.00 | 111% |
| Yield | 0.76 | 0.89 | 85% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 12 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CLSE | FTLS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 75% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 65% | 1 day ago 65% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 85% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 71% | 1 day ago 81% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 80% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 89% | 1 day ago 79% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 88% | 5 days ago 79% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 62% | 19 days ago 65% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 5 days ago 80% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | 5 days ago 80% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
CLSE and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CLSE has been closely correlated with FIX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CLSE jumps, then FIX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CLSE | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CLSE | 100% | -0.29% | ||
| FIX - CLSE | 66% Closely correlated | -1.37% | ||
| CIEN - CLSE | 64% Loosely correlated | -3.32% | ||
| MTZ - CLSE | 64% Loosely correlated | -3.40% | ||
| VRT - CLSE | 62% Loosely correlated | -4.07% | ||
| EME - CLSE | 61% Loosely correlated | -2.16% | ||
More | ||||
FTLS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FTLS has been loosely correlated with GS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FTLS jumps, then GS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FTLS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FTLS | 100% | -0.12% | ||
| GS - FTLS | 55% Loosely correlated | -0.88% | ||
| MS - FTLS | 55% Loosely correlated | -0.54% | ||
| ROK - FTLS | 53% Loosely correlated | -2.47% | ||
| C - FTLS | 53% Loosely correlated | -0.06% | ||
| CAT - FTLS | 52% Loosely correlated | -2.20% | ||
More | ||||