CLSK
Price
$17.19
Change
-$0.26 (-1.49%)
Updated
Jun 23 closing price
Capitalization
4.41B
48 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
FROG
Price
$78.71
Change
-$1.18 (-1.48%)
Updated
Jun 23 closing price
Capitalization
9.53B
42 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CLSK vs FROG

CLSK vs FROG Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CLSK vs. FROG commentary
Jun 24, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLSK is a Hold and FROG is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 24, 2026
Stock price -- (CLSK: $17.19 vs. FROG: $78.71)
Brand notoriety: CLSK and FROG are both not notable
CLSK represents the Investment Banks/Brokers, while FROG is part of the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CLSK: 86% vs. FROG: 72%
Market capitalization -- CLSK: $4.41B vs. FROG: $9.53B
CLSK [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $4.41B. FROG’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $9.53B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $195.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $14.43B. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $8.12B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CLSK’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileFROG’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CLSK’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • FROG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FROG is a better buy in the long-term than CLSK.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CLSK’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FROG’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CLSK’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • FROG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CLSK is a better buy in the short-term than FROG.

Price Growth

CLSK (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а -0.38% price change this week, while FROG (@Packaged Software) price change was +0.29% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was -1.94%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.57%, and the average quarterly price growth was -6.90%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -3.44%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.93%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.88%.

Reported Earning Dates

CLSK is expected to report earnings on Aug 11, 2026.

FROG is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (-1.94% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

@Packaged Software (-3.44% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FROG($9.53B) has a higher market cap than CLSK($4.41B). CLSK YTD gains are higher at: 69.911 vs. FROG (26.017). FROG has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -56.54M vs. CLSK (-69.3M). CLSK has more cash in the bank: 935M vs. FROG (741M). FROG has less debt than CLSK: FROG (16.4M) vs CLSK (1.79B). CLSK has higher revenues than FROG: CLSK (740M) vs FROG (563M).
CLSKFROGCLSK / FROG
Capitalization4.41B9.53B46%
EBITDA-69.3M-56.54M123%
Gain YTD69.91126.017269%
P/E Ratio7.38N/A-
Revenue740M563M131%
Total Cash935M741M126%
Total Debt1.79B16.4M10,921%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CLSK: Fundamental Ratings
CLSK
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
38
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
72
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
91
SMR RATING
1..100
98
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
37
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
86
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CLSKFROG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
81%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CLSK
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FROG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GDDY76.101.11
+1.48%
GoDaddy
BHFAP14.78-0.04
-0.27%
Brighthouse Financial
BRSL10.82-0.13
-1.19%
Brightstar Lottery PLC
MPTI93.19-2.27
-2.38%
M-tron Industries
NOMA3.32-0.20
-5.68%
Nomadar Corp.

FROG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FROG has been closely correlated with RAMP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FROG jumps, then RAMP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FROG
1D Price
Change %
FROG100%
-1.48%
RAMP - FROG
67%
Closely correlated
-0.03%
COIN - FROG
60%
Loosely correlated
-4.04%
CLSK - FROG
56%
Loosely correlated
-1.46%
GTLB - FROG
54%
Loosely correlated
+4.53%
RIOT - FROG
52%
Loosely correlated
+0.19%
More