CLSK
Price
$9.21
Change
+$0.60 (+6.97%)
Updated
Jun 3, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
4.78B
69 days until earnings call
GSIW
Price
$0.74
Change
-$0.01 (-1.33%)
Updated
Jun 3, 04:55 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
104.31M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CLSK vs GSIW

Header iconCLSK vs GSIW Comparison
Open Charts CLSK vs GSIWBanner chart's image
CleanSpark
Price$9.21
Change+$0.60 (+6.97%)
Volume$246.73K
Capitalization4.78B
Garden Stage
Price$0.74
Change-$0.01 (-1.33%)
Volume$680
Capitalization104.31M
CLSK vs GSIW Comparison Chart
Loading...
CLSK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GSIW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CLSK vs. GSIW commentary
Jun 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLSK is a StrongBuy and GSIW is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 04, 2025
Stock price -- (CLSK: $9.21 vs. GSIW: $0.75)
Brand notoriety: CLSK and GSIW are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CLSK: 104% vs. GSIW: 14%
Market capitalization -- CLSK: $4.78B vs. GSIW: $104.31M
CLSK [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $4.78B. GSIW’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $104.31M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $12.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CLSK’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileGSIW’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CLSK’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • GSIW’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, GSIW is a better buy in the long-term than CLSK.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CLSK’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GSIW’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CLSK’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • GSIW’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both CLSK and GSIW are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

CLSK (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а -6.59% price change this week, while GSIW (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was +2.52% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was -0.48%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was +92.22%.

Reported Earning Dates

CLSK is expected to report earnings on Aug 12, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (-0.48% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLSK($4.78B) has a higher market cap than GSIW($104M). GSIW YTD gains are higher at: 12.838 vs. CLSK (0.000).
CLSKGSIWCLSK / GSIW
Capitalization4.78B104M4,597%
EBITDA60.4MN/A-
Gain YTD0.00012.838-
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue216MN/A-
Total Cash176MN/A-
Total Debt15.2MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CLSK vs GSIW: Fundamental Ratings
CLSK
GSIW
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7036
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
74
Overvalued
60
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
82100
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6238
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GSIW's Valuation (60) in the Specialty Telecommunications industry is in the same range as CLSK (74) in the null industry. This means that GSIW’s stock grew similarly to CLSK’s over the last 12 months.

CLSK's Profit vs Risk Rating (82) in the null industry is in the same range as GSIW (100) in the Specialty Telecommunications industry. This means that CLSK’s stock grew similarly to GSIW’s over the last 12 months.

CLSK's SMR Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as GSIW (100) in the Specialty Telecommunications industry. This means that CLSK’s stock grew similarly to GSIW’s over the last 12 months.

GSIW's Price Growth Rating (38) in the Specialty Telecommunications industry is in the same range as CLSK (62) in the null industry. This means that GSIW’s stock grew similarly to CLSK’s over the last 12 months.

GSIW's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the Specialty Telecommunications industry is in the same range as CLSK (100) in the null industry. This means that GSIW’s stock grew similarly to CLSK’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CLSKGSIW
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CLSK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GSIW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JFAMX32.37N/A
N/A
JPMorgan Emerging Markets Equity A
PMDAX17.90N/A
N/A
Principal Small-MidCap Dividend Inc A
MSGNX6.08N/A
N/A
MassMutual Small Cap Gr Eq R3
TRIIX4.35N/A
N/A
Catalyst/SMH Total Return Income I
POIRX16.24N/A
N/A
Polen International Growth Investor

GSIW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GSIW and FUTU have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GSIW and FUTU's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GSIW
1D Price
Change %
GSIW100%
+4.23%
FUTU - GSIW
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.77%
TREE - GSIW
16%
Poorly correlated
-0.94%
CLSK - GSIW
15%
Poorly correlated
-0.23%
HOOD - GSIW
10%
Poorly correlated
+2.77%
GS - GSIW
9%
Poorly correlated
-0.29%
More