CLSK
Price
$9.47
Change
-$0.08 (-0.84%)
Updated
Aug 29 closing price
Capitalization
2.66B
109 days until earnings call
GSIW
Price
$0.10
Change
-$0.01 (-9.09%)
Updated
Aug 29 closing price
Capitalization
7.4M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CLSK vs GSIW

Header iconCLSK vs GSIW Comparison
Open Charts CLSK vs GSIWBanner chart's image
CleanSpark
Price$9.47
Change-$0.08 (-0.84%)
Volume$17.1M
Capitalization2.66B
Garden Stage
Price$0.10
Change-$0.01 (-9.09%)
Volume$7.8M
Capitalization7.4M
CLSK vs GSIW Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CLSK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GSIW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CLSK vs. GSIW commentary
Aug 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLSK is a Hold and GSIW is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 30, 2025
Stock price -- (CLSK: $9.47 vs. GSIW: $0.10)
Brand notoriety: CLSK and GSIW are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CLSK: 76% vs. GSIW: 36%
Market capitalization -- CLSK: $2.66B vs. GSIW: $7.4M
CLSK [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $2.66B. GSIW’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $7.4M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $10.34B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CLSK’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileGSIW’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CLSK’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • GSIW’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CLSK is a better buy in the long-term than GSIW.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CLSK’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GSIW’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CLSK’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • GSIW’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CLSK is a better buy in the short-term than GSIW.

Price Growth

CLSK (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а -3.56% price change this week, while GSIW (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was -2.72% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was -0.83%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.52%, and the average quarterly price growth was +20.65%.

Reported Earning Dates

CLSK is expected to report earnings on Dec 17, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (-0.83% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLSK($2.66B) has a higher market cap than GSIW($7.4M). CLSK YTD gains are higher at: 2.823 vs. GSIW (-84.985).
CLSKGSIWCLSK / GSIW
Capitalization2.66B7.4M35,958%
EBITDA626MN/A-
Gain YTD2.823-84.985-3%
P/E Ratio11.01N/A-
Revenue632MN/A-
Total Cash916MN/A-
Total Debt820MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CLSK vs GSIW: Fundamental Ratings
CLSK
GSIW
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5477
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
72
Overvalued
65
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
92100
SMR RATING
1..100
51100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6197
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
58100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
903

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GSIW's Valuation (65) in the Specialty Telecommunications industry is in the same range as CLSK (72) in the null industry. This means that GSIW’s stock grew similarly to CLSK’s over the last 12 months.

CLSK's Profit vs Risk Rating (92) in the null industry is in the same range as GSIW (100) in the Specialty Telecommunications industry. This means that CLSK’s stock grew similarly to GSIW’s over the last 12 months.

CLSK's SMR Rating (51) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GSIW (100) in the Specialty Telecommunications industry. This means that CLSK’s stock grew somewhat faster than GSIW’s over the last 12 months.

CLSK's Price Growth Rating (61) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GSIW (97) in the Specialty Telecommunications industry. This means that CLSK’s stock grew somewhat faster than GSIW’s over the last 12 months.

CLSK's P/E Growth Rating (58) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GSIW (100) in the Specialty Telecommunications industry. This means that CLSK’s stock grew somewhat faster than GSIW’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CLSKGSIW
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
87%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 23 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CLSK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GSIW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MYNZ1.680.03
+1.82%
Mainz Biomed N.V.
HAE54.540.20
+0.37%
Haemonetics Corp
SVRA3.280.01
+0.31%
Savara
ATOM3.28-0.05
-1.50%
Atomera
UMC6.58-0.11
-1.64%
United Microelectronic Corp

GSIW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GSIW and FUTU have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GSIW and FUTU's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GSIW
1D Price
Change %
GSIW100%
-5.39%
FUTU - GSIW
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.27%
LPLA - GSIW
17%
Poorly correlated
-0.10%
CLSK - GSIW
15%
Poorly correlated
-0.84%
MARA - GSIW
9%
Poorly correlated
+0.13%
GS - GSIW
9%
Poorly correlated
-0.26%
More