FUTU
Price
$100.11
Change
+$2.57 (+2.63%)
Updated
Jun 15, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
14.04B
71 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
GSIW
Price
$28.50
Change
-$1.30 (-4.36%)
Updated
Jun 15, 12:56 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
40.25M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FUTU vs GSIW

Header iconFUTU vs GSIW Comparison
Open Charts FUTU vs GSIWBanner chart's image
FUTU vs GSIW Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FUTU vs. GSIW commentary
Jun 16, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FUTU is a StrongBuy and GSIW is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 16, 2026
Stock price -- (FUTU: $100.12 vs. GSIW: $28.50)
Brand notoriety: FUTU and GSIW are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FUTU: 52% vs. GSIW: 337%
Market capitalization -- FUTU: $14.04B vs. GSIW: $40.25M
FUTU [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $14.04B. GSIW’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $40.25M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $14.2B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FUTU’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileGSIW’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FUTU’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • GSIW’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FUTU is a better buy in the long-term than GSIW.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FUTU’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GSIW’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FUTU’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • GSIW’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FUTU is a better buy in the short-term than GSIW.

Price Growth

FUTU (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а +9.93% price change this week, while GSIW (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was -10.60% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +3.33%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.52%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.81%.

Reported Earning Dates

FUTU is expected to report earnings on Aug 26, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (+3.33% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FUTU($14B) has a higher market cap than GSIW($40.3M). GSIW YTD gains are higher at: 10.294 vs. FUTU (-38.051). FUTU has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 14.9B vs. GSIW (-7.41M). FUTU has more cash in the bank: 23.6B vs. GSIW (10.3M). GSIW has less debt than FUTU: GSIW (141K) vs FUTU (22.5B). FUTU has higher revenues than GSIW: FUTU (24B) vs GSIW (8.05M).
FUTUGSIWFUTU / GSIW
Capitalization14B40.3M34,739%
EBITDA14.9B-7.41M-201,196%
Gain YTD-38.05110.294-370%
P/E Ratio11.06N/A-
Revenue24B8.05M297,989%
Total Cash23.6B10.3M229,126%
Total Debt22.5B141K15,957,447%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FUTU vs GSIW: Fundamental Ratings
FUTU
GSIW
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5245
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
12
Undervalued
64
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10099
SMR RATING
1..100
3599
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8749
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
92100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5015

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FUTU's Valuation (12) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GSIW (64) in the Specialty Telecommunications industry. This means that FUTU’s stock grew somewhat faster than GSIW’s over the last 12 months.

GSIW's Profit vs Risk Rating (99) in the Specialty Telecommunications industry is in the same range as FUTU (100) in the null industry. This means that GSIW’s stock grew similarly to FUTU’s over the last 12 months.

FUTU's SMR Rating (35) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GSIW (99) in the Specialty Telecommunications industry. This means that FUTU’s stock grew somewhat faster than GSIW’s over the last 12 months.

GSIW's Price Growth Rating (49) in the Specialty Telecommunications industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FUTU (87) in the null industry. This means that GSIW’s stock grew somewhat faster than FUTU’s over the last 12 months.

FUTU's P/E Growth Rating (92) in the null industry is in the same range as GSIW (100) in the Specialty Telecommunications industry. This means that FUTU’s stock grew similarly to GSIW’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FUTUGSIW
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
85%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
84%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
89%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
87%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bullish Trend 26 days ago
89%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
81%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FUTU
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
GSIW
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CAMLX50.23N/A
N/A
Congress Large Cap Growth Retail
GSPTX37.79N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs Large Cap Equity Inv
DCCIX35.46N/A
N/A
Nomura Small Cap Core I
FCLKX19.90N/A
N/A
Fidelity Large Cap Stock K6
PETGX12.06N/A
N/A
Gabelli Pet Parents'™ A

GSIW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GSIW and CD have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GSIW and CD's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GSIW
1D Price
Change %
GSIW100%
-7.17%
CD - GSIW
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.42%
LMFA - GSIW
24%
Poorly correlated
-1.01%
STKE - GSIW
23%
Poorly correlated
+3.15%
FUTU - GSIW
20%
Poorly correlated
+2.65%
CLSK - GSIW
15%
Poorly correlated
+4.00%
More