CLSK
Price
$12.55
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 28 closing price
50 days until earnings call
HUT
Price
$17.21
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 28 closing price
Ad is loading...

CLSK vs HUT

Header iconCLSK vs HUT Comparison
Open Charts CLSK vs HUTBanner chart's image
CleanSpark
Price$12.55
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$43.27M
CapitalizationN/A
Hut 8
Price$17.21
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$8.63M
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
CLSK vs HUT Comparison Chart
Loading...
CLSK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
HUT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
VS
CLSK vs. HUT commentary
Oct 30, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLSK is a Buy and HUT is a StrongBuy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 30, 2024
Stock price -- (CLSK: $12.55 vs. HUT: $17.21)
Brand notoriety: CLSK and HUT are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CLSK: 182% vs. HUT: 192%
Market capitalization -- CLSK: $4.78B vs. HUT: $985.18M
CLSK [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $4.78B. HUT’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $985.18M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $11.46B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CLSK’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileHUT’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CLSK’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • HUT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, HUT is a better buy in the long-term than CLSK.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CLSK’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HUT’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CLSK’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • HUT’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HUT is a better buy in the short-term than CLSK.

Price Growth

CLSK (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а -1.10% price change this week, while HUT (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was +12.26% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +1.30%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +11.60%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.15%.

Reported Earning Dates

CLSK is expected to report earnings on Feb 06, 2025.

HUT is expected to report earnings on May 06, 2024.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (+1.30% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLSK($4.78B) has a higher market cap than HUT($985M). HUT YTD gains are higher at: 29.010 vs. CLSK (13.781). CLSK has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 60.4M vs. HUT (-80.09M). CLSK has more cash in the bank: 176M vs. HUT (21.1M). CLSK has less debt than HUT: CLSK (15.2M) vs HUT (79.5M). CLSK has higher revenues than HUT: CLSK (216M) vs HUT (77M).
CLSKHUTCLSK / HUT
Capitalization4.78B985M485%
EBITDA60.4M-80.09M-75%
Gain YTD13.78129.01048%
P/E RatioN/A12.84-
Revenue216M77M281%
Total Cash176M21.1M834%
Total Debt15.2M79.5M19%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CLSK vs HUT: Fundamental Ratings
CLSK
HUT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1217
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
71
Overvalued
65
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8484
SMR RATING
1..100
9496
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4339
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8724
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
32n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HUT's Valuation (65) in the null industry is in the same range as CLSK (71). This means that HUT’s stock grew similarly to CLSK’s over the last 12 months.

HUT's Profit vs Risk Rating (84) in the null industry is in the same range as CLSK (84). This means that HUT’s stock grew similarly to CLSK’s over the last 12 months.

CLSK's SMR Rating (94) in the null industry is in the same range as HUT (96). This means that CLSK’s stock grew similarly to HUT’s over the last 12 months.

HUT's Price Growth Rating (39) in the null industry is in the same range as CLSK (43). This means that HUT’s stock grew similarly to CLSK’s over the last 12 months.

HUT's P/E Growth Rating (24) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CLSK (87). This means that HUT’s stock grew somewhat faster than CLSK’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CLSKHUT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CLSK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
HUT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME22.732.16
+10.50%
GameStop Corp
BTC.X69907.7600001978.460900
+2.91%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
AAPL233.401.99
+0.86%
Apple
SPY580.831.79
+0.31%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
TSLA262.51-6.68
-2.48%
Tesla

CLSK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CLSK has been closely correlated with RIOT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CLSK jumps, then RIOT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CLSK
1D Price
Change %
CLSK100%
+10.18%
RIOT - CLSK
85%
Closely correlated
+9.54%
MARA - CLSK
81%
Closely correlated
+11.02%
HIVE - CLSK
75%
Closely correlated
+13.22%
MSTR - CLSK
74%
Closely correlated
+8.96%
WULF - CLSK
74%
Closely correlated
+7.37%
More