Advertisement
CLSK vs INTU
Which Stock Would AI Choose? CleanSpark (CLSK) vs. Intuit (INTU) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- CleanSpark’s Q2 FY2024 revenue surged 163% YoY to $111.8 M, while Intuit’s Q3 FY2024 revenue grew 12% YoY to $6.74 B.
- CleanSpark posted a net profit of $126.7 M (EPS $0.59) versus Intuit’s GAAP diluted EPS of $8.42.
- Both companies are expanding capacity: CleanSpark adding ~75 MW in Wyoming, Intuit scaling TurboTax Live (target $1.4 B FY 2024 revenue).
- Intuit maintains a stronger balance sheet ($4.7 B cash, $6 B debt) and a rising dividend; CleanSpark’s cash‑plus‑Bitcoin liquidity sits near $680 M with virtually no debt.
- AI‑driven initiatives dominate strategic roadmaps for both firms, but CleanSpark’s mining‑specific AI (Intuit Assist) differs from Intuit’s consumer‑AI enhancements.
Introduction
Investors and traders frequently compare high‑growth fintech names that blend software, data‑center operations, and emerging artificial‑intelligence (AI) capabilities. CLSK (CleanSpark) leads the Bitcoin‑mining and low‑carbon micro‑grid niche, while INTU (Intuit) dominates tax‑software, small‑business accounting, and consumer‑finance platforms. This comparison targets growth‑oriented investors who value AI‑enabled product innovation and balance‑sheet strength in a volatile macro environment.
CLSK Overview and Recent Performance
CleanSpark (Nasdaq: CLSK) bills itself as “America’s Bitcoin Miner™.” In the most recent quarter (Q2 FY2024), the company reported $111.8 M in revenue, a 163% year‑over‑year increase, and net income of $126.7 M (basic EPS $0.59). Adjusted EBITDA reached $181.8 M, reflecting strong mining margins despite higher power costs. Hashrate capacity surpassed 17 EH/s, up roughly 60% since the start of 2024, driven by new facilities in Mississippi and Georgia.
Balance‑sheet highlights include $323 M cash, $358 M of Bitcoin assets (valued at ~$358 M), and total liquidity of $681 M. Debt is negligible – under $13 M – giving CleanSpark a durable financial footing to fund future expansions. The company announced a 75 MW Wyoming acquisition (45 MW + 30 MW) slated for completion before winter, which could add 4.2 EH/s initially and up to 7.4 EH/s after a planned 55 MW load‑study expansion, pushing total managed capacity beyond 550 MW. Operational efficiency remains a focus: the fleet’s energy cost sits around $32 per terahash (J/TH) with a target below $28, well under the current market hash price of ~$50 per terahash.
INTU Overview and Recent Performance
Intuit Inc. (Nasdaq: INTU) provides TurboTax, QuickBooks, Credit Karma, and Mailchimp. For its fiscal third quarter ending April 30 2024, Intuit posted revenue of $6.74 B (up 12% YoY) and GAAP diluted earnings per share of $8.42 (14% YoY). Non‑GAAP earnings per share reached $9.88, a 11% increase. Consumer Group sales rose 9% to $3.7 B, while the Small‑Business & Self‑Employed segment surged 18% to $2.38 B, propelled by a 19% jump in Online Ecosystem revenue (payments, payroll, Mailchimp). International online growth held steady at +12% constant‑currency.
Intuit’s balance sheet shows $4.7 B in cash and investments and $6 B of debt. The firm repurchased $584 M of shares this quarter and raised its quarterly dividend to $0.90 per share (15% increase). Strategic highlights include TurboTax Live, the assisted tax‑service platform now projected to generate $1.4 B in FY2024 (≈30% of consumer revenue) with a 17% growth rate, and continued AI integration via Intuit Assist, which supported 24 M customer interactions. Guidance for FY2024 was upgraded to 13% revenue growth (total $16.16‑$16.20 B) and non‑GAAP EPS of $16.79‑$16.84.
Trending AI Robots
The Trending AI Robots page on Tickeron showcases the platform’s most effective AI‑driven trading bots out of a library of hundreds that span thousands of tickers. Each robot varies by strategy (trend‑following, mean‑reversion, high‑frequency), timeframe (intraday to multi‑week), and performance metrics such as win‑rate, Sharpe ratio, and maximum drawdown. Only bots that demonstrate consistent edge under current market conditions earn a spot in the curated Trending section. Traders can explore detailed statistics, back‑tested results, and live performance before deploying capital. For those interested in automated exposure to CLSK or INTU, the Trending AI Robots list is a useful starting point.
Head-to-Head Comparison
| Metric | CLSK | INTU |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Business | Bitcoin mining & low‑carbon micro‑grids | Tax, accounting, credit‑score & marketing SaaS |
| Latest Revenue | $111.8 M (Q2 FY2024) | $6.74 B (Q3 FY2024) |
| Revenue Growth YoY | +163% | +12% |
| Net Income / EPS | $126.7 M (EPS $0.59) – GAAP | GAAP EPS $8.42; Non‑GAAP EPS $9.88 |
| Operating Margin (Adj. EBITDA/Revenue) | ≈163% | ≈55% (non‑GAAP) |
| Balance‑Sheet Liquidity | $681 M cash/Bitcoin, < $13 M debt | $4.7 B cash, $6 B debt |
| Growth Catalysts | New mining sites (WY), AI‑optimised hash cost, Bitcoin price exposure | TurboTax Live expansion, QBO adoption, AI Assist, international Mailchimp growth |
| Risk Factors | Bitcoin price volatility, regulatory changes, energy‑price swings | Economic slowdown affecting small‑business spend, tax‑policy shifts, competitive SaaS landscape |
| Dividend | None | $0.90 per share (quarterly) |
Tickeron AI Verdict
Based on recent trend consistency, balance‑sheet resilience, and AI‑driven growth pipelines, Tickeron’s AI model currently favors INTU. The company combines steady earnings expansion, a diversified SaaS portfolio, and a rising dividend—factors that historically support lower volatility and higher probability of sustaining upside. CleanSpark presents a high‑growth, high‑volatility play tied to Bitcoin price dynamics; while its mining margin improvement is promising, the model assigns a slightly lower probability of outperformance relative to Intuit’s broader, more insulated revenue base.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLSK is a Hold and INTU is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CLSK’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileINTU’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- CLSK’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- INTU’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CLSK’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while INTU’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CLSK’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
- INTU’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
CLSK (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а +12.62% price change this week, while INTU (@Packaged Software) price change was -5.33% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +2.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.99%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.08%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -2.09%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.34%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.38%.
Reported Earning Dates
CLSK is expected to report earnings on Aug 11, 2026.
INTU is expected to report earnings on Aug 20, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Investment Banks/Brokers (+2.38% weekly)These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.
@Packaged Software (-2.09% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
| CLSK | INTU | CLSK / INTU | |
| Capitalization | 4.42B | 73B | 6% |
| EBITDA | -69.3M | 6.92B | -1% |
| Gain YTD | 65.810 | -59.179 | -111% |
| P/E Ratio | 7.38 | 16.29 | 45% |
| Revenue | 740M | 20.9B | 4% |
| Total Cash | 935M | 8.44B | 11% |
| Total Debt | 1.79B | 6.9B | 26% |
CLSK | INTU | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 90 | 56 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 72 Overvalued | 12 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 92 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 99 | 42 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 37 | 66 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 86 | 98 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 90 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
INTU's Valuation (12) in the Packaged Software industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CLSK (72) in the null industry. This means that INTU’s stock grew somewhat faster than CLSK’s over the last 12 months.
CLSK's Profit vs Risk Rating (92) in the null industry is in the same range as INTU (100) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that CLSK’s stock grew similarly to INTU’s over the last 12 months.
INTU's SMR Rating (42) in the Packaged Software industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CLSK (99) in the null industry. This means that INTU’s stock grew somewhat faster than CLSK’s over the last 12 months.
CLSK's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as INTU (66) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that CLSK’s stock grew similarly to INTU’s over the last 12 months.
CLSK's P/E Growth Rating (86) in the null industry is in the same range as INTU (98) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that CLSK’s stock grew similarly to INTU’s over the last 12 months.
| CLSK | INTU | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 69% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | 1 day ago 64% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 65% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 61% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% | 1 day ago 64% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | 1 day ago 68% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 18 days ago 63% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 88% | 1 day ago 66% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 89% | 1 day ago 67% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 1 day ago 72% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| MYY | 15.48 | 0.18 | +1.20% |
| ProShares Short MidCap400 | |||
| BRNY | 57.62 | -0.50 | -0.86% |
| Burney U.S. Factor Rotation ETF | |||
| BBUS | 133.64 | -1.65 | -1.22% |
| JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Equity ETF | |||
| SPYC | 45.30 | -0.65 | -1.41% |
| Simplify US Equity PLUS Convexity ETF | |||
| OWNB | 20.40 | -0.48 | -2.31% |
| Bitwise Bitcoin Standard Corporations ETF | |||
INTU and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, INTU has been closely correlated with WDAY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if INTU jumps, then WDAY could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To INTU | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| INTU | 100% | -4.24% | ||
| WDAY - INTU | 71% Closely correlated | -3.90% | ||
| CLSK - INTU | 65% Loosely correlated | -2.78% | ||
| COIN - INTU | 64% Loosely correlated | -2.57% | ||
| TEAM - INTU | 60% Loosely correlated | -4.05% | ||
| RIOT - INTU | 60% Loosely correlated | +0.04% | ||
More | ||||