CLSK
Price
$9.55
Change
-$0.03 (-0.31%)
Updated
Aug 28 closing price
Capitalization
2.68B
110 days until earnings call
MKTW
Price
$17.88
Change
+$0.05 (+0.28%)
Updated
Aug 28 closing price
Capitalization
49.33M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CLSK vs MKTW

Header iconCLSK vs MKTW Comparison
Open Charts CLSK vs MKTWBanner chart's image
CleanSpark
Price$9.55
Change-$0.03 (-0.31%)
Volume$16.49M
Capitalization2.68B
MarketWise
Price$17.88
Change+$0.05 (+0.28%)
Volume$10.1K
Capitalization49.33M
CLSK vs MKTW Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CLSK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MKTW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CLSK vs. MKTW commentary
Aug 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLSK is a Hold and MKTW is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 29, 2025
Stock price -- (CLSK: $9.55 vs. MKTW: $17.88)
Brand notoriety: CLSK and MKTW are both not notable
CLSK represents the Investment Banks/Brokers, while MKTW is part of the Financial Publishing/Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CLSK: 72% vs. MKTW: 65%
Market capitalization -- CLSK: $2.68B vs. MKTW: $49.33M
CLSK [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $2.68B. MKTW’s [@Financial Publishing/Services] market capitalization is $49.33M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Publishing/Services] industry ranges from $167.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $10.29B. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Publishing/Services] industry is $31.3B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CLSK’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMKTW’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CLSK’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MKTW’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MKTW is a better buy in the long-term than CLSK.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CLSK’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MKTW’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CLSK’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MKTW’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 8 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CLSK is a better buy in the short-term than MKTW.

Price Growth

CLSK (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а +2.36% price change this week, while MKTW (@Financial Publishing/Services) price change was +1.59% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +0.07%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.48%, and the average quarterly price growth was +22.07%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Publishing/Services industry was -0.05%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.51%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.30%.

Reported Earning Dates

CLSK is expected to report earnings on Dec 17, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (+0.07% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

@Financial Publishing/Services (-0.05% weekly)

The financial publishing /services sector includes companies that provide informational products and services that are of value to investors, financial/analytics professionals and other interested readers. The products include real-time stock quotes, financial news and analyses. Think S&P Global, Inc., Moody`s Corporation, Thomson-Reuters Corp and IHS Markit Ltd. Information is critical in making financial or investment decisions, and what makes this industry’s output relevant at all times, across various economic conditions.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLSK($2.68B) has a higher market cap than MKTW($49.3M). CLSK has higher P/E ratio than MKTW: CLSK (11.10) vs MKTW (6.19). MKTW YTD gains are higher at: 65.456 vs. CLSK (3.692). CLSK has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 626M vs. MKTW (84.9M). CLSK has more cash in the bank: 916M vs. MKTW (69.1M). MKTW has less debt than CLSK: MKTW (1.51M) vs CLSK (820M). CLSK has higher revenues than MKTW: CLSK (632M) vs MKTW (358M).
CLSKMKTWCLSK / MKTW
Capitalization2.68B49.3M5,444%
EBITDA626M84.9M737%
Gain YTD3.69265.4566%
P/E Ratio11.106.19179%
Revenue632M358M177%
Total Cash916M69.1M1,326%
Total Debt820M1.51M54,305%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CLSK: Fundamental Ratings
CLSK
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
54
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
72
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
91
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
62
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
90

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CLSKMKTW
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
82%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CLSK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MKTW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BRNS1.180.04
+3.47%
Barinthus Biotherapeutics plc
MKSI107.521.84
+1.75%
MKS Inc
IDDWF26.45N/A
N/A
Indutrade AB
NNDM1.40-0.04
-2.78%
Nano Dimension Ltd
PHVS22.84-0.94
-3.95%
Pharvaris NV

CLSK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CLSK has been closely correlated with MSTR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CLSK jumps, then MSTR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CLSK
1D Price
Change %
CLSK100%
-0.31%
MSTR - CLSK
74%
Closely correlated
-0.94%
COIN - CLSK
74%
Closely correlated
-0.16%
AFRM - CLSK
71%
Closely correlated
+3.09%
TTD - CLSK
68%
Closely correlated
+5.15%
LSPD - CLSK
67%
Closely correlated
+1.72%
More

MKTW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MKTW has been loosely correlated with COIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MKTW jumps, then COIN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MKTW
1D Price
Change %
MKTW100%
+0.28%
COIN - MKTW
42%
Loosely correlated
-0.16%
RIOT - MKTW
38%
Loosely correlated
+1.85%
CLSK - MKTW
35%
Loosely correlated
-0.31%
OSPN - MKTW
32%
Poorly correlated
+0.20%
DJCO - MKTW
30%
Poorly correlated
+0.27%
More