It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
DJCO’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMKTW’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
DJCO’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MKTW’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
DJCO (@Packaged Software) experienced а -0.49% price change this week, while MKTW (@Financial Publishing/Services) price change was +10.39% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -2.53%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.62%, and the average quarterly price growth was -9.13%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Publishing/Services industry was +1.72%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.73%, and the average quarterly price growth was -10.63%.
MKTW is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2026.
Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
@Financial Publishing/Services (+1.72% weekly)The financial publishing /services sector includes companies that provide informational products and services that are of value to investors, financial/analytics professionals and other interested readers. The products include real-time stock quotes, financial news and analyses. Think S&P Global, Inc., Moody`s Corporation, Thomson-Reuters Corp and IHS Markit Ltd. Information is critical in making financial or investment decisions, and what makes this industry’s output relevant at all times, across various economic conditions.
| DJCO | MKTW | DJCO / MKTW | |
| Capitalization | 802M | 54.9M | 1,461% |
| EBITDA | 18.1M | 46.9M | 39% |
| Gain YTD | 19.328 | 45.328 | 43% |
| P/E Ratio | 57.40 | 12.34 | 465% |
| Revenue | 94.1M | 322M | 29% |
| Total Cash | 451M | 52.7M | 856% |
| Total Debt | 20.9M | 5.71M | 366% |
DJCO | MKTW | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 27 | 7 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 65 Fair valued | 5 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 46 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 87 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 45 | 39 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 2 | 8 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 24 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
MKTW's Valuation (5) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DJCO (65) in the Publishing Newspapers industry. This means that MKTW’s stock grew somewhat faster than DJCO’s over the last 12 months.
DJCO's Profit vs Risk Rating (46) in the Publishing Newspapers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MKTW (100) in the null industry. This means that DJCO’s stock grew somewhat faster than MKTW’s over the last 12 months.
DJCO's SMR Rating (87) in the Publishing Newspapers industry is in the same range as MKTW (100) in the null industry. This means that DJCO’s stock grew similarly to MKTW’s over the last 12 months.
MKTW's Price Growth Rating (39) in the null industry is in the same range as DJCO (45) in the Publishing Newspapers industry. This means that MKTW’s stock grew similarly to DJCO’s over the last 12 months.
DJCO's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Publishing Newspapers industry is in the same range as MKTW (8) in the null industry. This means that DJCO’s stock grew similarly to MKTW’s over the last 12 months.
| DJCO | MKTW | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 69% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 55% | 1 day ago 82% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 76% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 50% | 1 day ago 78% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 55% | 1 day ago 76% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 65% | 1 day ago 72% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 63% | 1 day ago 79% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 22 days ago 56% | 18 days ago 87% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 62% | 1 day ago 86% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 67% | 1 day ago 90% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DJCO has been loosely correlated with QLYS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DJCO jumps, then QLYS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DJCO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DJCO | 100% | +0.95% | ||
| QLYS - DJCO | 55% Loosely correlated | -0.75% | ||
| NTCT - DJCO | 53% Loosely correlated | -1.24% | ||
| PATH - DJCO | 49% Loosely correlated | +1.46% | ||
| CCSI - DJCO | 48% Loosely correlated | +0.75% | ||
| SNPS - DJCO | 47% Loosely correlated | -2.62% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MKTW has been loosely correlated with RIOT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MKTW jumps, then RIOT could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MKTW | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MKTW | 100% | +2.23% | ||
| RIOT - MKTW | 38% Loosely correlated | -3.70% | ||
| CLSK - MKTW | 35% Loosely correlated | -3.81% | ||
| OSPN - MKTW | 32% Poorly correlated | -0.53% | ||
| DJCO - MKTW | 30% Poorly correlated | +0.95% | ||
| CDNS - MKTW | 29% Poorly correlated | -1.63% | ||
More | ||||