CLSK
Price
$12.30
Change
+$0.32 (+2.67%)
Updated
Aug 24, 01:33 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
3.08B
114 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
PAYO
Price
$7.11
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 24, 12:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
2.41B
79 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CLSK vs PAYO

CLSK vs PAYO Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CLSK vs. PAYO commentary
Aug 24, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLSK is a Hold and PAYO is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 24, 2026
Stock price -- (CLSK: $11.98 vs. PAYO: $7.11)
Brand notoriety: CLSK and PAYO are both not notable
CLSK represents the Investment Banks/Brokers, while PAYO is part of the Computer Communications industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CLSK: 118% vs. PAYO: 16%
Market capitalization -- CLSK: $3.08B vs. PAYO: $2.41B
CLSK [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $3.08B. PAYO’s [@Computer Communications] market capitalization is $2.41B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Computer Communications] industry ranges from $3.59T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $13.42B. The average market capitalization across the [@Computer Communications] industry is $33.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CLSK’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePAYO’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CLSK’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • PAYO’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, PAYO is a better buy in the long-term than CLSK.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CLSK’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PAYO’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CLSK’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • PAYO’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PAYO is a better buy in the short-term than CLSK.

Price Growth

CLSK (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а -0.91% price change this week, while PAYO (@Computer Communications) price change was -0.28% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +7.92%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +14.78%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.64%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was -0.37%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.63%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.13%.

Reported Earning Dates

CLSK is expected to report earnings on Dec 16, 2026.

PAYO is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (+7.92% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

@Computer Communications (-0.37% weekly)

Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLSK($3.08B) has a higher market cap than PAYO($2.41B). PAYO has higher P/E ratio than CLSK: PAYO (50.79) vs CLSK (7.38). PAYO YTD gains are higher at: 26.512 vs. CLSK (18.379). PAYO has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 196M vs. CLSK (-69.3M). CLSK has more cash in the bank: 935M vs. PAYO (339M). PAYO has less debt than CLSK: PAYO (80M) vs CLSK (1.79B). PAYO has higher revenues than CLSK: PAYO (843M) vs CLSK (740M).
CLSKPAYOCLSK / PAYO
Capitalization3.08B2.41B128%
EBITDA-69.3M196M-35%
Gain YTD18.37926.51269%
P/E Ratio7.3850.7915%
Revenue740M843M88%
Total Cash935M339M276%
Total Debt1.79B80M2,239%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CLSK: Fundamental Ratings
CLSK
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
81
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
98
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
62
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
87
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CLSKPAYO
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
85%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
79%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
72%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
76%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CLSK
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PAYO
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FLQL78.540.37
+0.48%
Franklin US Large Cap Mltfctr Idx ETF
DIAL17.93N/A
N/A
Columbia Diversified Fixed Inc Allc ETF
GSX31.16N/A
N/A
Tradr 2X Long GS Daily ETF
XFEB37.93N/A
N/A
FT Vest US Eq Enh & Mod Buf ETF-Feb
BLUI25.76-0.02
-0.07%
Bluemonte Diversified Income ETF