CLSK
Price
$17.35
Change
+$0.87 (+5.28%)
Updated
Jun 15, 03:11 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
4.23B
57 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
PAYO
Price
$7.02
Change
+$0.27 (+4.00%)
Updated
Jun 15, 12:27 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
2.26B
58 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CLSK vs PAYO

Header iconCLSK vs PAYO Comparison
Open Charts CLSK vs PAYOBanner chart's image
CLSK vs PAYO Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CLSK vs. PAYO commentary
Jun 15, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLSK is a Hold and PAYO is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 15, 2026
Stock price -- (CLSK: $16.48 vs. PAYO: $6.75)
Brand notoriety: CLSK and PAYO are both not notable
CLSK represents the Investment Banks/Brokers, while PAYO is part of the Computer Communications industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CLSK: 86% vs. PAYO: 173%
Market capitalization -- CLSK: $4.23B vs. PAYO: $2.26B
CLSK [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $4.23B. PAYO’s [@Computer Communications] market capitalization is $2.26B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Computer Communications] industry ranges from $2.9T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $13.95B. The average market capitalization across the [@Computer Communications] industry is $29.97B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CLSK’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePAYO’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CLSK’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • PAYO’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, PAYO is a better buy in the long-term than CLSK.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CLSK’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PAYO’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CLSK’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • PAYO’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PAYO is a better buy in the short-term than CLSK.

Price Growth

CLSK (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а +5.71% price change this week, while PAYO (@Computer Communications) price change was +33.93% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +3.96%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.01%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.94%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was +9.83%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +10.92%, and the average quarterly price growth was +34.28%.

Reported Earning Dates

CLSK is expected to report earnings on Aug 11, 2026.

PAYO is expected to report earnings on Aug 12, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (+3.96% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

@Computer Communications (+9.83% weekly)

Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLSK($4.23B) has a higher market cap than PAYO($2.26B). PAYO has higher P/E ratio than CLSK: PAYO (33.75) vs CLSK (7.38). CLSK YTD gains are higher at: 62.846 vs. PAYO (20.107). PAYO has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 196M vs. CLSK (-69.3M). CLSK has more cash in the bank: 935M vs. PAYO (339M). PAYO has less debt than CLSK: PAYO (80M) vs CLSK (1.79B). PAYO has higher revenues than CLSK: PAYO (843M) vs CLSK (740M).
CLSKPAYOCLSK / PAYO
Capitalization4.23B2.26B187%
EBITDA-69.3M196M-35%
Gain YTD62.84620.107313%
P/E Ratio7.3833.7522%
Revenue740M843M88%
Total Cash935M339M276%
Total Debt1.79B80M2,239%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CLSK: Fundamental Ratings
CLSK
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
91
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
72
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
92
SMR RATING
1..100
99
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
37
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
87
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CLSKPAYO
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
78%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
87%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CLSK
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PAYO
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SIXH42.970.40
+0.94%
ETC 6 Meridian Hdg Eq-Idx Opt Strat ETF
RGT14.450.12
+0.84%
Royce Global Value Trust
ARKK75.650.19
+0.25%
ARK Innovation ETF
PLDR37.84N/A
N/A
Putnam Sustainable Leaders ETF
PGRI26.10N/A
N/A
Putnam International Stock ETF

PAYO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PAYO has been loosely correlated with SHOP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PAYO jumps, then SHOP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PAYO
1D Price
Change %
PAYO100%
N/A
SHOP - PAYO
55%
Loosely correlated
-2.02%
COIN - PAYO
50%
Loosely correlated
-0.41%
DT - PAYO
50%
Loosely correlated
+0.94%
AFRM - PAYO
48%
Loosely correlated
-0.48%
CLSK - PAYO
45%
Loosely correlated
+1.92%
More