CLSK
Price
$10.57
Change
+$0.77 (+7.86%)
Updated
Nov 5, 04:00 PM (EDT)
43 days until earnings call
PHR
Price
$18.33
Change
-$0.13 (-0.70%)
Updated
Nov 5, 01:14 PM (EDT)
29 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

CLSK vs PHR

Header iconCLSK vs PHR Comparison
Open Charts CLSK vs PHRBanner chart's image
CleanSpark
Price$10.57
Change+$0.77 (+7.86%)
Volume$2.96M
CapitalizationN/A
Phreesia
Price$18.33
Change-$0.13 (-0.70%)
Volume$100
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
CLSK vs PHR Comparison Chart
Loading...
CLSK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
PHR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
VS
CLSK vs. PHR commentary
Nov 05, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLSK is a StrongBuy and PHR is a Buy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 05, 2024
Stock price -- (CLSK: $9.81 vs. PHR: $18.46)
Brand notoriety: CLSK and PHR are both not notable
CLSK represents the Investment Banks/Brokers, while PHR is part of the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CLSK: 85% vs. PHR: 71%
Market capitalization -- CLSK: $4.78B vs. PHR: $1.3B
CLSK [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $4.78B. PHR’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $1.3B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $11.46B. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $11.24B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CLSK’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePHR’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CLSK’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • PHR’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, PHR is a better buy in the long-term than CLSK.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CLSK’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PHR’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CLSK’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • PHR’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PHR is a better buy in the short-term than CLSK.

Price Growth

CLSK (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а -21.87% price change this week, while PHR (@Packaged Software) price change was +0.71% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was -1.36%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.53%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.42%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -0.24%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.85%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.92%.

Reported Earning Dates

CLSK is expected to report earnings on Feb 06, 2025.

PHR is expected to report earnings on Mar 26, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (-1.36% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

@Packaged Software (-0.24% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLSK($4.78B) has a higher market cap than PHR($1.3B). CLSK YTD gains are higher at: -11.106 vs. PHR (-20.259). CLSK has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 60.4M vs. PHR (-104M). CLSK has more cash in the bank: 176M vs. PHR (87.5M). PHR has less debt than CLSK: PHR (12M) vs CLSK (15.2M). PHR has higher revenues than CLSK: PHR (356M) vs CLSK (216M).
CLSKPHRCLSK / PHR
Capitalization4.78B1.3B367%
EBITDA60.4M-104M-58%
Gain YTD-11.106-20.25955%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue216M356M61%
Total Cash176M87.5M201%
Total Debt15.2M12M127%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CLSK: Fundamental Ratings
CLSK
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
59
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
71
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
84
SMR RATING
1..100
93
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
45
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
87
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CLSKPHR
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 21 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
80%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
81%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CLSK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
PHR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PRNEX40.660.39
+0.97%
T. Rowe Price New Era
HBMCX25.990.08
+0.31%
Hartford MidCap HLS IB
LKSCX21.360.06
+0.28%
LKCM Small Cap Equity Instl
BFONX24.400.04
+0.16%
Biondo Focus Investor
ECASX30.270.03
+0.10%
Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap C

CLSK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CLSK has been closely correlated with RIOT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CLSK jumps, then RIOT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CLSK
1D Price
Change %
CLSK100%
-5.04%
RIOT - CLSK
85%
Closely correlated
-4.87%
MARA - CLSK
81%
Closely correlated
-3.94%
HIVE - CLSK
75%
Closely correlated
-4.24%
MSTR - CLSK
74%
Closely correlated
-2.92%
WULF - CLSK
74%
Closely correlated
-3.39%
More