Advertisement
PHR vs QLYS
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PHR is a StrongBuy and QLYS is a StrongBuy.
PHR | QLYS | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 73 | 64 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 79 Overvalued | 72 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 70 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 87 | 27 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 64 | 37 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 98 | 31 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
QLYS's Valuation (72) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as PHR (79) in the null industry. This means that QLYS’s stock grew similarly to PHR’s over the last 12 months.
QLYS's Profit vs Risk Rating (70) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as PHR (100) in the null industry. This means that QLYS’s stock grew similarly to PHR’s over the last 12 months.
QLYS's SMR Rating (27) in the Packaged Software industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PHR (87) in the null industry. This means that QLYS’s stock grew somewhat faster than PHR’s over the last 12 months.
QLYS's Price Growth Rating (37) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as PHR (64) in the null industry. This means that QLYS’s stock grew similarly to PHR’s over the last 12 months.
QLYS's P/E Growth Rating (31) in the Packaged Software industry is significantly better than the same rating for PHR (98) in the null industry. This means that QLYS’s stock grew significantly faster than PHR’s over the last 12 months.
| PHR | QLYS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 74% | 1 day ago 66% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 75% | 1 day ago 74% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 64% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 74% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 75% | 1 day ago 67% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% | 1 day ago 68% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 74% | 6 days ago 67% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 83% | 4 days ago 71% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 72% | 1 day ago 63% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 57% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
PHR’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while QLYS’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- PHR’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- QLYS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
PHR’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while QLYS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- PHR’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
- QLYS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
PHR (@Services to the Health Industry) experienced а +1.10% price change this week, while QLYS (@Computer Communications) price change was -1.45% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Services to the Health Industry industry was -1.08%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.04%, and the average quarterly price growth was +24.06%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was -0.35%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.17%, and the average quarterly price growth was +25.24%.
Reported Earning Dates
PHR is expected to report earnings on Dec 14, 2026.
QLYS is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Services to the Health Industry (-1.08% weekly)This industry comprises companies that provide services, such as equipment sterilization, research, physician management systems and consulting, that support the healthcare/medical industry. Examples of such companies include Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings, which operates one of the largest clinical laboratory networks in the world; Quest Diagnostics Inc., which is a clinical laboratory; and Syneos Health, which is a major clinical research organization.
@Computer Communications (-0.35% weekly)Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.
Advertisement
PHR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PHR has been loosely correlated with COIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PHR jumps, then COIN could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PHR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PHR | 100% | -0.49% | ||
| COIN - PHR | 57% Loosely correlated | -1.70% | ||
| CLSK - PHR | 55% Loosely correlated | -4.37% | ||
| QTWO - PHR | 49% Loosely correlated | -1.84% | ||
| QLYS - PHR | 49% Loosely correlated | +0.81% | ||
| RIOT - PHR | 49% Loosely correlated | -6.00% | ||
More | ||||
QLYS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QLYS has been loosely correlated with TENB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if QLYS jumps, then TENB could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QLYS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QLYS | 100% | +0.81% | ||
| TENB - QLYS | 66% Loosely correlated | +2.93% | ||
| OKTA - QLYS | 56% Loosely correlated | +3.58% | ||
| CRWD - QLYS | 55% Loosely correlated | +2.82% | ||
| DJCO - QLYS | 54% Loosely correlated | +0.34% | ||
| PCTY - QLYS | 54% Loosely correlated | -0.44% | ||
More | ||||