CLSK
Price
$9.21
Change
+$0.60 (+6.97%)
Updated
Jun 3 closing price
Capitalization
4.78B
69 days until earnings call
PUBM
Price
$12.07
Change
+$0.19 (+1.60%)
Updated
Jun 3 closing price
Capitalization
1.19B
69 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CLSK vs PUBM

Header iconCLSK vs PUBM Comparison
Open Charts CLSK vs PUBMBanner chart's image
CleanSpark
Price$9.21
Change+$0.60 (+6.97%)
Volume$26.74M
Capitalization4.78B
PubMatic
Price$12.07
Change+$0.19 (+1.60%)
Volume$578.26K
Capitalization1.19B
CLSK vs PUBM Comparison Chart
Loading...
CLSK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PUBM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CLSK vs. PUBM commentary
Jun 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLSK is a StrongBuy and PUBM is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 04, 2025
Stock price -- (CLSK: $9.21 vs. PUBM: $12.07)
Brand notoriety: CLSK and PUBM are both not notable
CLSK represents the Investment Banks/Brokers, while PUBM is part of the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CLSK: 105% vs. PUBM: 94%
Market capitalization -- CLSK: $4.78B vs. PUBM: $1.19B
CLSK [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $4.78B. PUBM’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $1.19B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $12.11B. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $12.67B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CLSK’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePUBM’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CLSK’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • PUBM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both CLSK and PUBM are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CLSK’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PUBM’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CLSK’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • PUBM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CLSK is a better buy in the short-term than PUBM.

Price Growth

CLSK (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а -6.59% price change this week, while PUBM (@Packaged Software) price change was +3.07% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was -0.45%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.64%, and the average quarterly price growth was +92.24%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +1.32%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.89%, and the average quarterly price growth was +38.38%.

Reported Earning Dates

CLSK is expected to report earnings on Aug 12, 2025.

PUBM is expected to report earnings on Aug 12, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (-0.45% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

@Packaged Software (+1.32% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLSK($4.78B) has a higher market cap than PUBM($1.19B). CLSK YTD gains are higher at: 0.000 vs. PUBM (-17.835). CLSK has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 60.4M vs. PUBM (46.8M). CLSK (176M) and PUBM (175M) have equal amount of cash in the bank . CLSK has less debt than PUBM: CLSK (15.2M) vs PUBM (21.8M). PUBM has higher revenues than CLSK: PUBM (267M) vs CLSK (216M).
CLSKPUBMCLSK / PUBM
Capitalization4.78B1.19B403%
EBITDA60.4M46.8M129%
Gain YTD0.000-17.835-
P/E RatioN/A148.38-
Revenue216M267M81%
Total Cash176M175M101%
Total Debt15.2M21.8M70%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CLSK: Fundamental Ratings
CLSK
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
73
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
74
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
80
SMR RATING
1..100
91
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
63
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
82
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
85

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CLSKPUBM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
78%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
77%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CLSK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PUBM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HIBL34.801.94
+5.90%
Direxion Daily S&P 500® Hi Bt Bl 3X ETF
RSPM32.330.32
+1.00%
Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Matrls ETF
COWG35.050.30
+0.86%
Pacer US Large Cp CA Cows Gr Ldrs ETF
TILL18.540.03
+0.16%
Teucrium Agricultural Str No K-1 ETF
BFK9.53-0.02
-0.21%
BlackRock Municipal Income Trust

CLSK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CLSK has been closely correlated with RIOT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CLSK jumps, then RIOT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CLSK
1D Price
Change %
CLSK100%
+6.97%
RIOT - CLSK
85%
Closely correlated
+6.49%
MARA - CLSK
84%
Closely correlated
+6.75%
BITF - CLSK
82%
Closely correlated
+0.43%
HIVE - CLSK
81%
Closely correlated
+6.21%
COIN - CLSK
77%
Closely correlated
+4.94%
More

PUBM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PUBM has been loosely correlated with EB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PUBM jumps, then EB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PUBM
1D Price
Change %
PUBM100%
+1.60%
EB - PUBM
61%
Loosely correlated
-1.21%
FIVN - PUBM
60%
Loosely correlated
+5.60%
DV - PUBM
59%
Loosely correlated
+4.71%
CLSK - PUBM
58%
Loosely correlated
+6.97%
MITK - PUBM
58%
Loosely correlated
+0.42%
More