Advertisement
HUT vs WULF
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Hut 8 Corp. (HUT) vs. TeraWulf Inc. (WULF) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- Both HUT and WULF operate in the energy infrastructure and digital asset mining sector, with recent expansions into AI and high-performance computing (HPC).
- HUT has surged over 400% in the past year, driven by a major $7 billion AI data center lease, while WULF has gained more than 600%, fueled by renewable energy focus and HPC leasing.
- Year-to-date, WULF leads with approximately 65% gains compared to HUT's 38%, amid broader crypto and AI market momentum.
- Recent market activity shows strong volatility for both, with HUT hitting new 52-week highs near $67 and WULF approaching $19.50.
- Analysts maintain "Buy" ratings on both, with price targets suggesting 10-25% upside, highlighting AI infrastructure as a key growth driver.
- Risk factors include Bitcoin price fluctuations and high operational leverage, but diversification into AI/HPC provides relative stability.
Introduction
In the evolving landscape of digital infrastructure, HUT and WULF stand out as comparable players blending Bitcoin mining with high-performance computing and AI data centers. Both companies leverage energy assets for energy-intensive applications, capitalizing on cryptocurrency rallies and surging demand for AI workloads. Traders seeking exposure to crypto volatility paired with AI growth, or investors eyeing sector rotation into power-constrained tech infrastructure, will find this stock comparison valuable for assessing relative performance, momentum, and market positioning in recent market activity.
HUT Overview and Recent Performance
HUT, or Hut 8 Corp., operates as an energy infrastructure platform focused on power, digital infrastructure, and compute services across the U.S. and Canada. Its segments include Power, Digital Infrastructure, Compute, and Other, supporting Bitcoin mining via its American Bitcoin subsidiary alongside AI cloud and colocation services. Recent weeks have seen HUT stock surge significantly, with gains exceeding 16% in short bursts amid a 400%+ one-year rise and 38% year-to-date. This momentum stems from a landmark 15-year, $7 billion lease for a 245 MW AI data center at its River Bend campus with Fluidstack and Anthropic, backed by Google, alongside AI expansion projects. Investor sentiment has strengthened on easing economic pressures and compute demand, pushing shares to new 52-week highs near $67, though volatility persists with Bitcoin exposure.
WULF Overview and Recent Performance
WULF, or TeraWulf Inc., owns and operates sustainable digital infrastructure for Bitcoin mining and HPC workloads, emphasizing clean, low-cost energy in the U.S. Recent market activity has propelled WULF shares higher, with over 600% one-year gains and 65% year-to-date, including multi-day surges approaching 9%. Key influences include its renewable energy positioning, expansion into HPC leasing, and positive analyst coverage amid AI infrastructure demand. Trading near $19 with 52-week highs at $19.50, the stock reflects bullish sentiment on operational milestones like increased hashrate and diversification beyond pure mining, despite ongoing losses and debt levels.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases the platform's top-performing AI trading bots, selected from over 351 total bots that trade thousands of different tickers across stocks, ETFs, and crypto. These curated bots earn their spot through superior performance in volatile markets, with AI analysis highlighting those best suited to current conditions like sector rotations in AI, energy, and semiconductors. Factual stats reveal impressive ranges: annualized returns from +12% to +153%, win rates of 53-87%, and profit factors up to 11.45. Examples include the Semiconductors SOXL bot at +101% annualized return and 68% win rate on 5-minute timeframes, or multi-ticker agents covering 25 stocks in minerals, semis, and aerospace with +117% returns. Each bot employs unique strategies—trend following, hedging, swing trading—across 5-60 minute frames. Explore these high-conviction signals to enhance your trading edge.
Head-to-Head Comparison
HUT and WULF share business models centered on energy-optimized infrastructure for mining and emerging HPC/AI, but diverge in execution. HUT emphasizes integrated power management and large-scale leases like its $7B AI deal, providing revenue visibility, while WULF prioritizes zero-carbon operations for sustainable appeal. Growth drivers favor WULF's higher YTD momentum (65% vs. 38%), but HUT leads in recent catalysts and analyst upside. Risk profiles show both with high betas over 4, exposed to Bitcoin halvings and energy costs, yet AI pivots mitigate pure crypto dependence. Sector exposure aligns on digital assets (90%+ hashrate), with market sentiment tilting toward HUT's contracts versus WULF's growth narrative.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron’s AI currently favors HUT for its trend consistency via secured long-term AI leases and superior recent momentum, including 52-week highs and stronger relative positioning in infrastructure deals. While WULF shows robust YTD gains and sustainability edge, HUT's catalysts suggest higher probability of outperformance amid AI demand and market volatility.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HUT is a Buy and WULF is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
HUT’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileWULF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- HUT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- WULF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
HUT’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WULF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- HUT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- WULF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
HUT (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а +18.13% price change this week, while WULF (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was +5.12% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +0.39%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.41%, and the average quarterly price growth was -9.21%.
Reported Earning Dates
HUT is expected to report earnings on Aug 18, 2026.
WULF is expected to report earnings on Aug 17, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Investment Banks/Brokers (+0.39% weekly)These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.
| HUT | WULF | HUT / WULF | |
| Capitalization | 15B | 13.1B | 115% |
| EBITDA | -287.41M | -483.91M | 59% |
| Gain YTD | 185.655 | 130.374 | 142% |
| P/E Ratio | 28.26 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 284M | 168M | 169% |
| Total Cash | 160M | 2.63B | 6% |
| Total Debt | 423M | 5.31B | 8% |
HUT | WULF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 44 | 29 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 93 Overvalued | 94 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 34 | 75 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 98 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 34 | 34 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 2 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
HUT's Valuation (93) in the null industry is in the same range as WULF (94). This means that HUT’s stock grew similarly to WULF’s over the last 12 months.
HUT's Profit vs Risk Rating (34) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WULF (75). This means that HUT’s stock grew somewhat faster than WULF’s over the last 12 months.
HUT's SMR Rating (98) in the null industry is in the same range as WULF (100). This means that HUT’s stock grew similarly to WULF’s over the last 12 months.
HUT's Price Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as WULF (34). This means that HUT’s stock grew similarly to WULF’s over the last 12 months.
HUT's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for WULF (100). This means that HUT’s stock grew significantly faster than WULF’s over the last 12 months.
| HUT | WULF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 89% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 88% | 6 days ago 87% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
Advertisement
HUT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HUT has been closely correlated with CIFR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HUT jumps, then CIFR could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HUT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HUT | 100% | -1.35% | ||
| CIFR - HUT | 79% Closely correlated | -0.19% | ||
| RIOT - HUT | 75% Closely correlated | +1.23% | ||
| CLSK - HUT | 71% Closely correlated | +0.23% | ||
| COIN - HUT | 71% Closely correlated | -6.19% | ||
| IREN - HUT | 67% Closely correlated | -1.68% | ||
More | ||||
WULF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WULF has been closely correlated with CIFR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if WULF jumps, then CIFR could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To WULF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WULF | 100% | +3.16% | ||
| CIFR - WULF | 72% Closely correlated | +9.50% | ||
| HUT - WULF | 65% Loosely correlated | +0.42% | ||
| CLSK - WULF | 61% Loosely correlated | -6.54% | ||
| RIOT - WULF | 61% Loosely correlated | -3.22% | ||
| COIN - WULF | 60% Loosely correlated | -4.72% | ||
More | ||||