CLSK
Price
$9.36
Change
-$0.51 (-5.17%)
Updated
May 23, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
4.78B
80 days until earnings call
YALA
Price
$7.12
Change
-$0.73 (-9.30%)
Updated
May 23, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
765.57M
79 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CLSK vs YALA

Header iconCLSK vs YALA Comparison
Open Charts CLSK vs YALABanner chart's image
CleanSpark
Price$9.36
Change-$0.51 (-5.17%)
Volume$214.33K
Capitalization4.78B
Yalla Group
Price$7.12
Change-$0.73 (-9.30%)
Volume$3.61K
Capitalization765.57M
CLSK vs YALA Comparison Chart
Loading...
CLSK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
YALA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CLSK vs. YALA commentary
May 24, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLSK is a Hold and YALA is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 24, 2025
Stock price -- (CLSK: $9.87 vs. YALA: $7.85)
Brand notoriety: CLSK and YALA are both not notable
CLSK represents the Investment Banks/Brokers, while YALA is part of the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CLSK: 191% vs. YALA: 1%
Market capitalization -- CLSK: $4.78B vs. YALA: $765.57M
CLSK [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $4.78B. YALA’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $765.57M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $12.04B. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $12.56B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CLSK’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileYALA’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CLSK’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • YALA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, YALA is a better buy in the long-term than CLSK.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CLSK’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while YALA’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CLSK’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • YALA’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CLSK is a better buy in the short-term than YALA.

Price Growth

CLSK (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а +5.45% price change this week, while YALA (@Packaged Software) price change was +1.16% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was -1.85%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +14.18%, and the average quarterly price growth was +96.41%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -2.15%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +11.38%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.16%.

Reported Earning Dates

CLSK is expected to report earnings on Aug 12, 2025.

YALA is expected to report earnings on Aug 11, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (-1.85% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

@Packaged Software (-2.15% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLSK($4.78B) has a higher market cap than YALA($766M). YALA YTD gains are higher at: 93.350 vs. CLSK (7.166). YALA has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 88.4M vs. CLSK (60.4M). YALA has more cash in the bank: 545M vs. CLSK (176M). YALA has less debt than CLSK: YALA (3.02M) vs CLSK (15.2M). YALA has higher revenues than CLSK: YALA (313M) vs CLSK (216M).
CLSKYALACLSK / YALA
Capitalization4.78B766M624%
EBITDA60.4M88.4M68%
Gain YTD7.16693.3508%
P/E RatioN/A8.75-
Revenue216M313M69%
Total Cash176M545M32%
Total Debt15.2M3.02M503%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CLSK: Fundamental Ratings
CLSK
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
18
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
74
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
78
SMR RATING
1..100
91
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
50
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
80
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CLSKYALA
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
72%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
76%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CLSK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
YALA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CGRCX28.34N/A
N/A
Invesco Comstock Select C
INUTX37.74N/A
N/A
Columbia Dividend Opportunity A
AMGCX8.68N/A
N/A
Alger Mid Cap Growth C
LEQAX12.14N/A
N/A
LoCorr Dynamic Opportunity A
FLCOX18.45N/A
N/A
Fidelity Large Cap Value Index

CLSK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CLSK has been closely correlated with RIOT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CLSK jumps, then RIOT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CLSK
1D Price
Change %
CLSK100%
-2.37%
RIOT - CLSK
86%
Closely correlated
N/A
MARA - CLSK
85%
Closely correlated
N/A
BITF - CLSK
82%
Closely correlated
N/A
HIVE - CLSK
82%
Closely correlated
+0.50%
COIN - CLSK
77%
Closely correlated
+5.00%
More

YALA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, YALA has been loosely correlated with COIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if YALA jumps, then COIN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To YALA
1D Price
Change %
YALA100%
N/A
COIN - YALA
48%
Loosely correlated
+5.00%
CLSK - YALA
43%
Loosely correlated
-2.37%
RIOT - YALA
40%
Loosely correlated
N/A
HOOD - YALA
35%
Loosely correlated
+1.42%
COMP - YALA
34%
Loosely correlated
N/A
More