Ad is loading...
CLSK
Price
$14.35
Change
+$0.49 (+3.54%)
Updated
Nov 29 closing price
Earnings call today
ZM
Price
$82.69
Change
-$2.67 (-3.13%)
Updated
Nov 29 closing price
91 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

CLSK vs ZM

Header iconCLSK vs ZM Comparison
Open Charts CLSK vs ZMBanner chart's image
CleanSpark
Price$14.35
Change+$0.49 (+3.54%)
Volume$28.95M
CapitalizationN/A
Zoom Communications
Price$82.69
Change-$2.67 (-3.13%)
Volume$3.23M
CapitalizationN/A
CLSK vs ZM Comparison Chart
Loading...
CLSK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
ZM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CLSK vs. ZM commentary
Dec 02, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLSK is a Buy and ZM is a Buy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 02, 2024
Stock price -- (CLSK: $14.35 vs. ZM: $82.69)
Brand notoriety: CLSK: Not notable vs. ZM: Notable
CLSK represents the Investment Banks/Brokers, while ZM is part of the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CLSK: 87% vs. ZM: 96%
Market capitalization -- CLSK: $4.78B vs. ZM: $20.11B
CLSK [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $4.78B. ZM’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $20.11B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $11.6B. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $11.53B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CLSK’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileZM’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CLSK’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • ZM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, ZM is a better buy in the long-term than CLSK.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CLSK’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ZM’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CLSK’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • ZM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CLSK is a better buy in the short-term than ZM.

Price Growth

CLSK (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а -4.97% price change this week, while ZM (@Packaged Software) price change was -3.71% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +2.88%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +12.91%, and the average quarterly price growth was +31.39%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +2.23%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.72%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.60%.

Reported Earning Dates

CLSK is expected to report earnings on Feb 06, 2025.

ZM is expected to report earnings on Mar 03, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (+2.88% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

@Packaged Software (+2.23% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ZM($20.1B) has a higher market cap than CLSK($4.78B). CLSK YTD gains are higher at: 30.100 vs. ZM (14.991). ZM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 630M vs. CLSK (60.4M). ZM has more cash in the bank: 6.96B vs. CLSK (176M). CLSK has less debt than ZM: CLSK (15.2M) vs ZM (73M). ZM has higher revenues than CLSK: ZM (4.53B) vs CLSK (216M).
CLSKZMCLSK / ZM
Capitalization4.78B20.1B24%
EBITDA60.4M630M10%
Gain YTD30.10014.991201%
P/E RatioN/A31.27-
Revenue216M4.53B5%
Total Cash176M6.96B3%
Total Debt15.2M73M21%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CLSK: Fundamental Ratings
CLSK
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
71
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
75
SMR RATING
1..100
94
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
38
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
88
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CLSKZM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
70%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
76%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CLSK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
ZM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
XYLO3.920.27
+7.40%
Xylo Technologies Ltd
DOUG2.540.16
+6.72%
Douglas Elliman
MOV20.35-0.02
-0.10%
Movado Group
ALLE140.84-0.57
-0.40%
Allegion Public Limited
RVLV36.08-0.85
-2.30%
Revolve Group

CLSK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CLSK has been closely correlated with RIOT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CLSK jumps, then RIOT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CLSK
1D Price
Change %
CLSK100%
+3.54%
RIOT - CLSK
86%
Closely correlated
+2.26%
MARA - CLSK
82%
Closely correlated
+1.86%
HIVE - CLSK
78%
Closely correlated
+0.99%
BITF - CLSK
77%
Closely correlated
N/A
WULF - CLSK
74%
Closely correlated
+8.23%
More