Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLSYX vs HFQRX
CLSYX vs HFQRX Comparison
Open Charts CLSYX vs HFQRX
CLSYX vs HFQRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLSYX vs. HFQRX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLSYX is a Hold and HFQRX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HFQRX has more cash in the bank: 7.92B vs. CLSYX (711M). HFQRX pays higher dividends than CLSYX: HFQRX (6.16) vs CLSYX (2.64). CLSYX was incepted earlier than HFQRX: CLSYX (17 years) vs HFQRX (11 years). CLSYX (0.83) is less costly to investors than HFQRX (0.69). HFQRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 175.00 vs. CLSYX (13.00). CLSYX (1000000) and HFQRX (1000000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. CLSYX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 29.94 vs. HFQRX (26.01). HFQRX return over 5 years is better than : 79.15 vs. CLSYX (49.61).
| CLSYX | HFQRX | CLSYX / HFQRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 0.69 | 112% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 0.69 | 120% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.718 | 18.519 | 112% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 711M | 7.92B | 9% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.64 | 6.16 | 43% |
| Returns for 1 year | 29.94 | 26.01 | 115% |
| Returns for 3 years | 66.92 | 78.22 | 86% |
| Returns for 5 years | 49.61 | 79.15 | 63% |
| Returns for 10 years | 94.81 | 131.68 | 72% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers