Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLSYX vs HFQRX
CLSYX vs HFQRX Comparison
Open Charts CLSYX vs HFQRX
CLSYX vs HFQRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLSYX vs. HFQRX commentary
Jul 26, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLSYX is a Hold and HFQRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HFQRX has more cash in the bank: 7.55B vs. CLSYX (688M). HFQRX pays higher dividends than CLSYX: HFQRX (6.36) vs CLSYX (2.61). CLSYX was incepted earlier than HFQRX: CLSYX (17 years) vs HFQRX (11 years). CLSYX (0.83) is less costly to investors than HFQRX (0.69). HFQRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 175.00 vs. CLSYX (13.00). CLSYX (1000000) and HFQRX (1000000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. CLSYX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.78 vs. HFQRX (22.61). HFQRX return over 5 years is better than : 73.83 vs. CLSYX (43.20).
| CLSYX | HFQRX | CLSYX / HFQRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 0.69 | 112% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 0.69 | 120% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.979 | 14.833 | 108% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 688M | 7.55B | 9% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.61 | 6.36 | 41% |
| Returns for 1 year | 24.78 | 22.61 | 110% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.74 | 63.78 | 81% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.20 | 73.83 | 59% |
| Returns for 10 years | 88.80 | 130.07 | 68% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers