Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLVRX vs RWMHX
CLVRX vs RWMHX Comparison
Open Charts CLVRX vs RWMHX
CLVRX vs RWMHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMHX has more cash in the bank: 219B vs. CLVRX (2.13B). CLVRX pays higher dividends than RWMHX: CLVRX (1.75) vs RWMHX (1.35). CLVRX was incepted earlier than RWMHX: CLVRX (4 years) vs RWMHX (11 years). RWMHX (0.41) is less costly to investors than CLVRX (0.29). RWMHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. CLVRX (27.00). RWMHX has a lower initial minimum investment than CLVRX: RWMHX (250) vs CLVRX (5000000). CLVRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.39 vs. RWMHX (5.64).
| CLVRX | RWMHX | CLVRX / RWMHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.19 | 0.41 | 46% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.29 | 0.41 | 71% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 22.070 | 3.801 | 581% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 250 | 2,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.13B | 219B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.75 | 1.35 | 129% |
| Returns for 1 year | 23.39 | 5.64 | 415% |
| Returns for 3 years | 55.76 | 28.74 | 194% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 27.46 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 76.53 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement