Ad is loading...
CLWFX vs GFACX
CLWFX vs GFACX Comparison
Open Charts CLWFX vs GFACX
Columbia Large Cap Growth Inst2
Price$66.83
Change+$1.24 (+1.89%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.03B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$57.41
Change+$0.90 (+1.59%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets260.89B
CLWFX vs GFACX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLWFX vs. GFACX commentary
Apr 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLWFX is a Buy and GFACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 261B vs. CLWFX (5.03B). CLWFX (0.00) and GFACX (0.00) have matching dividends . CLWFX was incepted earlier than GFACX: CLWFX (14 years) vs GFACX (24 years). GFACX (1.36) is less costly to investors than CLWFX (0.71). CLWFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. GFACX (25.00). CLWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFACX: CLWFX (0) vs GFACX (250). CLWFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -4.26 vs. GFACX (-7.10). CLWFX return over 5 years is better than : 54.77 vs. GFACX (37.34).
| CLWFX | GFACX | CLWFX / GFACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 1.36 | 52% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 1.36 | 52% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -14.585 | -9.959 | 146% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.03B | 261B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.26 | -7.10 | 60% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.27 | 2.19 | 834% |
| Returns for 5 years | 54.77 | 37.34 | 147% |
| Returns for 10 years | 75.91 | 35.37 | 215% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...