Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLWFX vs GFACX
CLWFX vs GFACX Comparison
Open Charts CLWFX vs GFACX
CLWFX vs GFACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLWFX vs. GFACX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLWFX is a Hold and GFACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. CLWFX (6.64B). CLWFX (0.00) and GFACX (0.00) have matching dividends . CLWFX was incepted earlier than GFACX: CLWFX (15 years) vs GFACX (25 years). GFACX (1.35) is less costly to investors than CLWFX (0.70). CLWFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. GFACX (32.00). CLWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFACX: CLWFX (0) vs GFACX (250). CLWFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.68 vs. GFACX (5.89). CLWFX return over 5 years is better than : 36.50 vs. GFACX (6.08).
| CLWFX | GFACX | CLWFX / GFACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.35 | 52% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.35 | 52% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.774 | 5.973 | 97% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.64B | 361B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.68 | 5.89 | 215% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.20 | 36.71 | 145% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.50 | 6.08 | 600% |
| Returns for 10 years | 170.47 | 88.28 | 193% |