Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLWFX vs RGACX
CLWFX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts CLWFX vs RGACX
Columbia Large Cap Growth Inst2
Price$85.25
Change+$0.61 (+0.72%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.29B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$83.04
Change+$0.52 (+0.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets327.53B
CLWFX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLWFX vs. RGACX commentary
Aug 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLWFX is a Buy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 328B vs. CLWFX (6.29B). RGACX pays higher dividends than CLWFX: RGACX (0.07) vs CLWFX (0.00). CLWFX was incepted earlier than RGACX: CLWFX (14 years) vs RGACX (23 years). RGACX (0.94) is less costly to investors than CLWFX (0.71). CLWFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). CLWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGACX: CLWFX (0) vs RGACX (250). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.23 vs. CLWFX (14.25). CLWFX return over 5 years is better than : 46.51 vs. RGACX (35.74).
| CLWFX | RGACX | CLWFX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 0.94 | 76% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 0.94 | 76% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.223 | 15.349 | 67% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.29B | 328B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.25 | 15.23 | 94% |
| Returns for 3 years | 72.70 | 53.12 | 137% |
| Returns for 5 years | 46.51 | 35.74 | 130% |
| Returns for 10 years | 136.79 | 95.87 | 143% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement