Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLWFX vs RGACX
CLWFX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts CLWFX vs RGACX
Columbia Cornerstone Growth Inst 2
Price$88.01
Change+$0.81 (+0.93%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.4B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$83.12
Change+$0.43 (+0.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets327.37B
CLWFX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLWFX vs. RGACX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLWFX is a Hold and RGACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 327B vs. CLWFX (6.4B). RGACX pays higher dividends than CLWFX: RGACX (0.07) vs CLWFX (0.00). CLWFX was incepted earlier than RGACX: CLWFX (15 years) vs RGACX (24 years). RGACX (0.94) is less costly to investors than CLWFX (0.71). CLWFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). CLWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGACX: CLWFX (0) vs RGACX (250). CLWFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.52 vs. RGACX (6.37). CLWFX return over 5 years is better than : 50.50 vs. RGACX (32.00).
| CLWFX | RGACX | CLWFX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 0.94 | 76% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 0.94 | 76% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.556 | 15.460 | 88% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.4B | 327B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.52 | 6.37 | 149% |
| Returns for 3 years | 88.46 | 61.11 | 145% |
| Returns for 5 years | 50.50 | 32.00 | 158% |
| Returns for 10 years | 129.64 | 85.80 | 151% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement