Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLWFX vs RGACX
CLWFX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts CLWFX vs RGACX
CLWFX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLWFX vs. RGACX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLWFX is a Buy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. CLWFX (6.58B). CLWFX (0.00) and RGACX (0.00) have matching dividends . CLWFX was incepted earlier than RGACX: CLWFX (16 years) vs RGACX (24 years). RGACX (0.93) is less costly to investors than CLWFX (0.70). CLWFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. RGACX (32.00). CLWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGACX: CLWFX (0) vs RGACX (250). CLWFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.18 vs. RGACX (-0.53). CLWFX return over 5 years is better than : 28.17 vs. RGACX (10.82).
| CLWFX | RGACX | CLWFX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.93 | 75% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.93 | 75% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.029 | 8.819 | 68% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.58B | 353B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.18 | -0.53 | -223% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.85 | 40.68 | 123% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.17 | 10.82 | 260% |
| Returns for 10 years | 156.30 | 101.31 | 154% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement