Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLWFX vs RGACX
CLWFX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts CLWFX vs RGACX
CLWFX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLWFX vs. RGACX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLWFX is a Buy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. CLWFX (6.72B). CLWFX (0.00) and RGACX (0.00) have matching dividends . CLWFX was incepted earlier than RGACX: CLWFX (15 years) vs RGACX (24 years). RGACX (0.93) is less costly to investors than CLWFX (0.70). CLWFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. RGACX (32.00). CLWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGACX: CLWFX (0) vs RGACX (250). CLWFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.89 vs. RGACX (3.68). CLWFX return over 5 years is better than : 33.85 vs. RGACX (13.46).
| CLWFX | RGACX | CLWFX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.93 | 75% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.93 | 75% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.232 | 6.959 | 104% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.72B | 357B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.89 | 3.68 | 242% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.22 | 37.13 | 133% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.85 | 13.46 | 251% |
| Returns for 10 years | 158.31 | 97.58 | 162% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement