Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLWFX vs RGACX
CLWFX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts CLWFX vs RGACX
CLWFX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLWFX vs. RGACX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLWFX is a Hold and RGACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. CLWFX (6.64B). CLWFX (0.00) and RGACX (0.00) have matching dividends . CLWFX was incepted earlier than RGACX: CLWFX (15 years) vs RGACX (24 years). RGACX (0.93) is less costly to investors than CLWFX (0.70). CLWFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. RGACX (32.00). CLWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGACX: CLWFX (0) vs RGACX (250). CLWFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.68 vs. RGACX (7.94). CLWFX return over 5 years is better than : 36.50 vs. RGACX (13.23).
| CLWFX | RGACX | CLWFX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.93 | 75% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.93 | 75% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.774 | 6.185 | 93% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.64B | 361B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.68 | 7.94 | 160% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.20 | 43.05 | 124% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.50 | 13.23 | 276% |
| Returns for 10 years | 170.47 | 107.97 | 158% |