Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLWFX vs RGACX
CLWFX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts CLWFX vs RGACX
CLWFX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLWFX vs. RGACX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLWFX is a Buy and RGACX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. CLWFX (6.46B). CLWFX (0.00) and RGACX (0.00) have matching dividends . CLWFX was incepted earlier than RGACX: CLWFX (15 years) vs RGACX (24 years). RGACX (0.93) is less costly to investors than CLWFX (0.70). CLWFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. RGACX (32.00). CLWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGACX: CLWFX (0) vs RGACX (250). CLWFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.92 vs. RGACX (0.93). CLWFX return over 5 years is better than : 27.97 vs. RGACX (10.91).
| CLWFX | RGACX | CLWFX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.93 | 75% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.93 | 75% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.391 | 5.397 | 63% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.46B | 357B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.92 | 0.93 | 207% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.84 | 33.65 | 127% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.97 | 10.91 | 256% |
| Returns for 10 years | 144.85 | 94.42 | 153% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement