Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLWFX vs RGAGX
CLWFX vs RGAGX Comparison
Open Charts CLWFX vs RGAGX
CLWFX vs RGAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLWFX vs. RGAGX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLWFX is a Hold and RGAGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 338B vs. CLWFX (7.02B). RGAGX pays higher dividends than CLWFX: RGAGX (0.51) vs CLWFX (0.00). CLWFX was incepted earlier than RGAGX: CLWFX (15 years) vs RGAGX (17 years). CLWFX (0.70) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.29). CLWFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. RGAGX (32.00). CLWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGAGX: CLWFX (0) vs RGAGX (250). CLWFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.12 vs. RGAGX (15.41). CLWFX return over 5 years is better than : 53.75 vs. RGAGX (27.14).
| CLWFX | RGAGX | CLWFX / RGAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.29 | 241% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.29 | 241% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.742 | 10.599 | 111% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.02B | 338B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.51 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.12 | 15.41 | 137% |
| Returns for 3 years | 65.37 | 55.31 | 118% |
| Returns for 5 years | 53.75 | 27.14 | 198% |
| Returns for 10 years | 170.35 | 117.06 | 146% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement