Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLWFX vs RGAGX
CLWFX vs RGAGX Comparison
Open Charts CLWFX vs RGAGX
CLWFX vs RGAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLWFX vs. RGAGX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLWFX is a Buy and RGAGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. CLWFX (6.58B). RGAGX pays higher dividends than CLWFX: RGAGX (0.51) vs CLWFX (0.00). CLWFX was incepted earlier than RGAGX: CLWFX (16 years) vs RGAGX (17 years). CLWFX (0.70) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.29). CLWFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. RGAGX (32.00). CLWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGAGX: CLWFX (0) vs RGAGX (250). CLWFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.18 vs. RGAGX (0.49). CLWFX return over 5 years is better than : 28.17 vs. RGAGX (15.00).
| CLWFX | RGAGX | CLWFX / RGAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.29 | 241% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.29 | 241% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.029 | 9.321 | 65% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.58B | 353B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.51 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.18 | 0.49 | 242% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.85 | 44.65 | 112% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.17 | 15.00 | 188% |
| Returns for 10 years | 156.30 | 110.30 | 142% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers